References
1. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, Tada M, Kohli Y, Nakajima M. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 1974 [cited 2024 Apr 28];20(4):148–51. Available from: https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(74)73914-1/abstract
2. Mccune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovrrz H. Endoscopic Cannulation of the Ampulla of Vater: A Preliminary Report [Internet]. 1968 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1387128/?page=3
3. Pinilla-Morales R, Montoya-Botero J, Oliveros-Wilches R, Manrique-Acevedo ME, Rey-Ferro M, Abadía-Díaz M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at a leading cancer center. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];35(4):430–5. Available from: https://revistagastrocol.com/index.php/rcg/article/view/512/966
4. Artifon E La, Tchekmedyian AJ, Aguirre PA. Colangiopancreatrografía retrógrada endoscópica: una técnica en permanente evolución [Internet]. Vol. 33, Rev Gatroenterol Peru. 2013 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rgp/v33n4/a06v33n4.pdf
5. Morán Tisoc L, Cumpa Quiroz R, Vargas Cárdenas G, Astete Benavides M, Valdivia Roldan M. Características de la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica en un centro de referencia nacional [Internet]. Vol. 25, Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú. Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú; 2005 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. 161–167 p. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1022-51292005000200005&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
6. Liao WC, Angsuwatcharakon P, Isayama H, Dhir V, Devereaux B, Khor CJL, et al. International consensus recommendations for difficult biliary access [Internet]. Vol. 85, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Mosby Inc.; 2017 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. p. 295–304. Available from: https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(16)30640-X/fulltext
7. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline [Internet]. Vol. 48, Endoscopy. Georg Thieme Verlag; 2016 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. p. 657–83. Available from: https://www.esge.com/assets/downloads/pdfs/guidelines/2016_s_0042_108641.pdf
8. Chen Q, Jin P, Ji X, Du H, Lu J. Management of difficult or failed biliary access in initial ERCP: A review of current literature. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];43(4):365–72. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210740118301852?via%3Dihub
9. Jang DK, Lee SH, Ahn DW, Paik WH, Lee JM, Lee JK, et al. Factors associated with complete clearance of difficult common bile duct stones after temporary biliary stenting followed by a second ERCP: A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Endoscopy. 2020 Jun 1;52(6):462–8.
10. Mohamed R, Lethebe BC, Gonzalez-Moreno E, Kayal A, Bass S, Cole M, et al. Morphology of the major papilla predicts ERCP procedural outcomes and adverse events. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];35(12):6455–65. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806980/
11. Ryozawa S, Yasuda I. Current strategies for the endoscopic management of difficult-to-treat bile duct stones in Japan [Internet]. Vol. 30, Digestive Endoscopy. Blackwell Publishing; 2018 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. p. 54–8. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.13020
12. Aburajab M, Dua K. Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones [Internet]. Vol. 20, Current Gastroenterology Reports. Current Medicine Group LLC 1; 2018 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11894-018-0613-1
13. Lagunas-Quiroz E, García-Marín AR, Becerra-Blancas FJ, Kammar-García A, Tepepa-López FJ. Factores asociados al aclaramiento de la vía biliar por cálculos difíciles en la segunda colangiografía endoscópica después de una prótesis biliar temporal, estudio retrospectivo a 5 años en el Hospital Juárez Centro. 2020;32(2):609–15. Available from: www.endoscopia-ameg.com
14. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Joseph Elmunzer B, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2015 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];81(1):143-149.e9. Available from: https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)01936-1/abstract
15. Ding X, Zhang FC, Wang YJ. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Surgeon [Internet]. 2015 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];13(4):218–29. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1479666X14001462?via%3Dihub
16. Haraldsson E, Lundell L, Swahn F, Enochsson L, Löhr JM, Arnelo U, et al. Endoscopic classification of the papilla of Vater. Results of an inter- and intraobserver agreement study. United European Gastroenterol J [Internet]. 2017 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];5(4):504–10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446150/
17. Haraldsson E, Kylänpää L, Grönroos J, Saarela A, Toth E, Qvigstad G, et al. Macroscopic appearance of the major duodenal papilla influences bile duct cannulation: a prospective multicenter study by the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy Study Group for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];90(6):957–63. Available from: https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(19)32062-0/abstract
18. Quiroga-Purizaca WG, Paucar-Aguilar DR, Barrientos-Pérez JA, Vargas-Blacido DA. Morphological Characteristics of the Duodenal Papilla and its Association with Complications Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a Peruvian Hospital. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2022 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28];37(3):296–301. Available from: https://revistagastrocol.com/index.php/rcg/article/view/859
19. Fahimi A, Langari A, Roshandel G, Hasani F, Kherad ME, Aghaei F, et al. Correlation Between Different Shapes of Major Papilla With Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in a Prospective Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 14;
20. J. García-Cano Lizcano, J. A. González Martín, J. Morillas Ariño, A. Pérez Sola. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A study in a small ERCP unit. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2024 Apr 28];96(3):163–73. Available from: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/diges/v96n3/es_original1.pdf
21. Constantino Gutierrez-De Aranguren, Victor Parra-Perez, Alonso Soto, Arturo Fernando Ruesta Córdova, Isabel Veramendi-Schult, Margarita Paula Hung Quiero, et al. Association between the type of major duodenal papilla and difficult biliary cannulation in a private tertiary center. Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 28];41(3):169–75. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rgp/v41n3/1022-5129-rgp-41-03-169.pdf
22. Chen PH, Tung CF, Peng YC, Yeh HZ, Chang C Sen, Chen CC. Duodenal major papilla morphology can affect biliary cannulation and complications during ERCP, an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep 23;20(1).