Year 2017 / Volume 109 / Number 1
Original
A survey-based analysis on endoscopic quality indicators compliance among Spanish endoscopists

33-48

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4705/2016

Ignacio Fernández-Urien, Federico Argüelles-Arias, Pedro A. Alonso-Aguirre, Javier Júdez, Begoña Bermejo,

Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopy plays a key role for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal disorders. Therefore, quality indicators have been widely proposed in order to optimize endoscopic practice. The aims of this study, promoted by the Spanish Society of Digestive Diseases (SEPD), were to assess the knowledge and compliance to endoscopy quality indicators among Spanish gastroenterologists. Methods: A 31-questionnaire survey was created based on the endoscopy quality indicators proposed by international guidelines. The survey was distributed among Spanish gastroenterologists who are members of the society. Using only fully completed surveys, a descriptive analysis was performed. Those factors related with a suboptimal quality performance were also investigated. Results: A total of 1,543 surveys were sent and 281 (18.2%) were received completed. Based on the answers obtained, the management of 14 (70%) out of 20 assessed quality indicators was poor: 5 (83.3%) out of 6 pre-procedure items, 7 (58.3%) out of 12 intra-procedure items and 2 (100%) out of 2 post-procedure items. Conclusions: A significant proportion of Spanish endoscopists do not comply with main endoscopic quality indicators. Factors such as “young” age, public setting, no colorectal cancer screening program and low volume of procedures/week are related to a poorer management of the assessed quality indicators and should be the target for future formative activities.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y, et al. Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 2003;35:506-510.
2. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004;127: 452-456.
3. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-350.
4. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96-102.
5. Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, et al. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 2012;44:470-475.
6. Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TM, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2014;146(4):950-60.
7. Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81(1):3-16.
8. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81(1):31-53.
9. Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF, et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012;44(10):957-68.
10. Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81(1):17-30.
11. Rutter MD, Rees CJ. Quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2014;46(6):526-8.
12. Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Int Med 2004;141(4):264–271.
13. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. New Engl J Med 2006;355(24):2533–2541.
14. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Alim Pharm Therap 2006;24(6):965–971.
15. Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43(6):554–558.
16. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE, et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69(7):1288–1295.
17. Gellad ZF, Voils CI, Lin L, et al. Physician perceptions on colonoscopy quality: results of a national survey of gastroenterologists. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014;2014:510494.
18. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–105.
19. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.
20. Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1117–21.
21. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1128–37.
22. Carballo F, Muñoz-Navas M. Prevention or cure in times of crisis: the case of screening for colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012;104(10): 537-45.
23. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-696.
24. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:11–30.
25. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-75.
26. European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group, von Karsa L, Patnick J, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325997
27. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-1981.
28. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-1595.
29. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472-1477.
30. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348:1467-1471.
31. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365-1371.
32. Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Basch CE, et al. Gastroenterologists’ perceived barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation: results of a national survey. J Cancer Educ 2012; 27:526–532.
33. Tinsley A, Naymagon S, Trindade AJ, et al. A survey of current practice of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47(1): e1–e6.
34. Whitson MJ, Bodian CA, Aisenberg J, et al. Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists’ practices and perceptions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75(3):641–8.
35. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012;143:844-57.
36. Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA, et al. 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:1225–31.
37. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1240–5.
38. Jover R, Zapater P, Bujanda L, et al. COLONPREV Study Investigators. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2016;48(3):241-7.
Related articles

Letter

Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9913/2023

Letter

Capsule endoscopy diagnosis of gastrointestinal melanoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9803/2023

Letter

Calcifying fibrous tumor and pathological analysis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9739/2023

Letter

Endoscopic observation of a rare duodenal tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9679/2023

Letter

Endoscopic rescue of a fistulizing biliary plastic stent

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9673/2023

Letter

MALT lymphoma of the colon: an endoscopic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9595/2023

Letter

Sigmoid volvulus management, only endoscopic devolvulation?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9488/2023

Letter

Isolated Jejunal Crohn's Disease: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9423/2022

Letter

New technique for the endoscopic removal of long foreign bodies

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9398/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Whipple’s disease – A typical endoscopic finding of a rare disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9338/2022

Letter

An uncommon colonic polyp

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9160/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

A rare endoscopic pattern in a patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9124/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Esophageal tuberculosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9108/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Esophagopleural fistula due to empyema necessitans

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9085/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Intestinal obstruction due to bariolith impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9084/2022

Letter

Anorectal malignant melanoma, a diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9068/2022

Letter

Lead ingestion, medical emergency and action plan

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9048/2022

Letter

Endoscopic findings of radiation ileitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9036/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Pneumatosis intestinalis: a rare endoscopic feature of colonic ischemia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8980/2022

Letter

Endoscopic imaging of pneumatosis intestinalis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8972/2022

Letter

Primary intestinal melanoma?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8944/2022

Editorial

Colonoscopy — When quality matters

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8942/2022

Letter

Intestinal amyloidosis: a diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8934/2022

Letter

Successful gallstone ileus treatment by endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8898/2022

Letter

Digestive tract MALT lymphoma, an unusual location

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8800/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Colonic Kaposi’s sarcoma as the first clinical manifestation of undiagnosed HIV

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8717/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Esophageal epidermoid metaplasia: an unusual condition

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8708/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Ileal neuroendocrine tumor as an uncommon cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8641/2022

Letter

Gastrointestinal lymphoma, a rare endoscopic lesion

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8555/2021

Letter

Cecal MALT lymphoma: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8526/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

A case of duodenal-type follicular lymphoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8233/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Endoscopic resection of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8232/2021

Letter

Surprises in cecal intubation: foreign bodies in the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8155/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Duodenal-type follicular lymphoma: a silent tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8149/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Ink stained gastric lesions: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8141/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Primary or idiopathic intestinal pneumatosis: a rare casual endoscopic finding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8049/2021

Letter

Bochdalek hernia: use of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7760/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Endoscopic forceps removal for complicated magnetic beads impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7731/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Esophageal involvement in a patient with pemphigus vulgaris

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7417/2020

Letter

Basic training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: recording images

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7385/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Phlebosclerotic colitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain and hematochezia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7358/2020

Review

Advanced therapy by device-assisted enteroscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6971/2020

Special Article

Quality indicators in enteroscopy. Enteroscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6946/2020

Letter

Luetic gastritis: an uncommon cause of gastritis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6870/2020

Letter

Gastric ulcer due to mucormycosis in a critical patient

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6636/2019

Letter

Primary gastric choriocarcinoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6478/2019

Case Report

Primary colon mantle lymphoma: a misleading macroscopic appearance!

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6405/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

Jejunal schwannoma detected by video capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6474/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

Capsule endoscopy, a useful tool for the diagnosis of a tapeworm infection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6346/2019

Editorial

Endoscopy units – Statu quo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6347/2019

Letter

Endoscopically diagnosed systemic mastocytosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6246/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

Cervical arthrodesis penetrated into the esophagus detected by gastroscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6222/2019

Special Article

The quality of abdominal ultrasound: a much-needed consensus

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6177/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

A rare heterotopic gastric mucosa appearing between the muscularis mucosae and submucosa

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6134/2018

Special Article

Quality indicators in gastroscopy. Gastroscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6023/2018

Letter

Endoscopic management of Boerhaave’s syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6013/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

Colorectal penetration by two intrauterine devices

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5974/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the main duct in a patient with pancreas divisum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5959/2018

Letter

Use of patency capsule in daily practice

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5952/2018

Editorial

Colorectal cancer screening and survival

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Letter

Symptomatic exfoliative esophagitis induced by dabigatran

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5747/2018

Special Article

The current situation of digestive endoscopy units in the Valencian Community

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5676/2018

Letter

Bacterial endogenous endophthalmitis after colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5658/2018

Special Article

Endoscopy and sedation: an inseparable binomial for the gastroenterologist

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5585/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

Dysphagia and hematemesis caused by an intramural esophageal dissection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5471/2018

Review

Quality indicators in colonoscopy. The colonoscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5408/2017

Letter to the Editor

A rare complication after colonoscopy: a splenic rupture

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5362/2017

Letter to the Editor

Acute appendicitis after a colonic endoscopic submucosal resection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5307/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

Contribution of the virtual colonoscopy in a case of intestinal intussusception

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5261/2017

Letter to the Editor

GETTEMO position statement on bariatric endoscopic techniques as a voluntary medicine

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5144/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

A bull horn fragment found on colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5020/2017

Letter to the Editor

Propofol sedation Quality and safety. Failure mode and effects analysis.

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4976/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

Metastasis of dermatofibrosarcoma diagnosed by capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.4900/2017

Editorial

Issue pending: minimizing anxiety before colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4756/2016

Letter to the Editor

Symptomatic retention of the Agile® patency capsule

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4691/2016

Letter to the Editor

Ball valve syndrome caused by a giant gastric Vanek’s tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4526/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Intrauterine device in the rectal cavity

Original

Coping with celiac disease: how heavy is the burden for caregivers?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4518/2016

Original

Multicenter study on the safety of bariatric endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4499/2016

Letter to the Editor

Endoscopic removal of a hashish packet

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4504/2016

Letter to the Editor

Primary chancre in the rectum: an underdiagnosed cause of rectal ulcer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4457/2016

Letter to the Editor

Whipple’s disease under the vision of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4362/2016

Letter to the Editor

Asymptomatic bronchial aspiration of capsule endoscope: a significant complication

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4363/2016

Letter to the Editor

Author´s reply: About human taeniasis and Taenia saginata diagnosis by endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4339/2016

Letter to the Editor

About human taeniasis and Taenia saginata diagnosis by endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4297/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis

Letter to the Editor

Transanal submucosal endoscopic resection (TASER) by TEO system®

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4154/2015

Letter to the Editor

Splenic rupture after colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3714/2015

Case Report

Atypical diagnosis diagnosis by endoscopic capsule: Whipple´s disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3718/2015

Citation tools
Fernández-Urien I, Argüelles-Arias F, Alonso-Aguirre P, Júdez J, Bermejo B. A survey-based analysis on endoscopic quality indicators compliance among Spanish endoscopists. 4705/2016


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 460 visits.
This article has been downloaded 122 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 01/11/2016

Accepted: 19/12/2016

Online First: 22/12/2016

Published: 03/01/2017

Article revision time: 47 days

Article Online First time: 51 days

Article editing time: 63 days


Share
This article has been rated by 1 readers.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology