Año 2017 / Volumen 109 / Número 1
Original
A survey-based analysis on endoscopic quality indicators compliance among Spanish endoscopists

33-48

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4705/2016

Ignacio Fernández-Urien, Federico Argüelles-Arias, Pedro A. Alonso-Aguirre, Javier Júdez, Begoña Bermejo,

Resumen
Introduction: Endoscopy plays a key role for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal disorders. Therefore, quality indicators have been widely proposed in order to optimize endoscopic practice. The aims of this study, promoted by the Spanish Society of Digestive Diseases (SEPD), were to assess the knowledge and compliance to endoscopy quality indicators among Spanish gastroenterologists. Methods: A 31-questionnaire survey was created based on the endoscopy quality indicators proposed by international guidelines. The survey was distributed among Spanish gastroenterologists who are members of the society. Using only fully completed surveys, a descriptive analysis was performed. Those factors related with a suboptimal quality performance were also investigated. Results: A total of 1,543 surveys were sent and 281 (18.2%) were received completed. Based on the answers obtained, the management of 14 (70%) out of 20 assessed quality indicators was poor: 5 (83.3%) out of 6 pre-procedure items, 7 (58.3%) out of 12 intra-procedure items and 2 (100%) out of 2 post-procedure items. Conclusions: A significant proportion of Spanish endoscopists do not comply with main endoscopic quality indicators. Factors such as “young” age, public setting, no colorectal cancer screening program and low volume of procedures/week are related to a poorer management of the assessed quality indicators and should be the target for future formative activities.
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y, et al. Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 2003;35:506-510.
2. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004;127: 452-456.
3. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-350.
4. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96-102.
5. Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, et al. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 2012;44:470-475.
6. Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TM, et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2014;146(4):950-60.
7. Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81(1):3-16.
8. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81(1):31-53.
9. Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF, et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012;44(10):957-68.
10. Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81(1):17-30.
11. Rutter MD, Rees CJ. Quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2014;46(6):526-8.
12. Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Int Med 2004;141(4):264–271.
13. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. New Engl J Med 2006;355(24):2533–2541.
14. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Alim Pharm Therap 2006;24(6):965–971.
15. Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43(6):554–558.
16. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE, et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69(7):1288–1295.
17. Gellad ZF, Voils CI, Lin L, et al. Physician perceptions on colonoscopy quality: results of a national survey of gastroenterologists. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014;2014:510494.
18. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–105.
19. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.
20. Lakoff J, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:1117–21.
21. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1128–37.
22. Carballo F, Muñoz-Navas M. Prevention or cure in times of crisis: the case of screening for colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012;104(10): 537-45.
23. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-696.
24. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:11–30.
25. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-75.
26. European Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Group, von Karsa L, Patnick J, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy. 2013;45(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325997
27. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-1981.
28. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-1595.
29. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472-1477.
30. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348:1467-1471.
31. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365-1371.
32. Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Basch CE, et al. Gastroenterologists’ perceived barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation: results of a national survey. J Cancer Educ 2012; 27:526–532.
33. Tinsley A, Naymagon S, Trindade AJ, et al. A survey of current practice of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47(1): e1–e6.
34. Whitson MJ, Bodian CA, Aisenberg J, et al. Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists’ practices and perceptions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75(3):641–8.
35. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012;143:844-57.
36. Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA, et al. 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:1225–31.
37. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1240–5.
38. Jover R, Zapater P, Bujanda L, et al. COLONPREV Study Investigators. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2016;48(3):241-7.
Artículos relacionados

Carta

Colon ulcers and HIV: an image to remember

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2025.11078/2025

Carta

Spontaneous esophageal submucosal hematoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10775/2024

Carta

A rare submucosal eminence of the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10707/2024

Carta

An unusual colon mass

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10613/2024

Carta

An unusual cecal submucosal mass in an elderly gentleman

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10606/2024

Carta

Capsule endoscopy: beyond the small bowel

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10449/2024

Carta

Casual finding in colonoscopy: Diphyllobothrium latum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10300/2024

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A long rectal foreign body successfully removed after colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10251/2024

Carta

Hemorrhagic shock due to ileal varices, a diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10241/2024

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Enfermedad de Crohn: más allá del intestino

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10185/2023

Carta

Esophagitis dissecans superficialis: a rare endoscopic finding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.10058/2023

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A rare case of colonic malakoplakia at the bottom of an adenoma mimicking an invasive carcinoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9994/2023

Carta

Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9913/2023

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Jejunum cavernous hemangioma: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9812/2023

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Polipectomía bajo el agua en orificio apendicular en paciente con anticoagulación

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9842/2023

Carta

Calcifying fibrous tumor and pathological analysis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9739/2023

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Endoscopic manifestations of jejunal choriocarcinoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9714/2023

Carta

Endoscopic observation of a rare duodenal tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9679/2023

Revisión

POEM from A to Z: current perspectives

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9602/2023

Carta

Linfoma MALT de colon: un desafío endoscópico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9595/2023

Carta

Isolated Jejunal Crohn's Disease: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9423/2022

Carta

New technique for the endoscopic removal of long foreign bodies

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9398/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Whipple’s disease – A typical endoscopic finding of a rare disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9338/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A case of esophageal histoplasmosis mimicking carcinoma on endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9167/2022

Carta

An uncommon colonic polyp

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9160/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A rare endoscopic pattern in a patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9124/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Esophageal tuberculosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9108/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Esophagopleural fistula due to empyema necessitans

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9085/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Obstrucción intestinal por impactación de bariolito

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9084/2022

Carta

Melanoma anorrectal maligno, un reto diagnóstico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9068/2022

Carta

Endoscopic findings of radiation ileitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9036/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Pneumatosis intestinalis: a rare endoscopic feature of colonic ischemia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8980/2022

Carta

Imagen endoscópica de la pneumatosis intestinal

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8972/2022

Carta

¿Melanoma intestinal primario?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8944/2022

Editorial

Colonoscopia: cuando la calidad importa

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8942/2022

Carta

Amiloidosis intestinal: un reto diagnóstico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8934/2022

Carta

Íleo biliar resuelto por endoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8898/2022

Carta

Digestive tract MALT lymphoma, an unusual location

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8800/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Colonic Kaposi’s sarcoma as the first clinical manifestation of undiagnosed HIV

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8717/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Metaplasia epidermoide de esófago: una entidad infrecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8708/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Tumor neuroendocrino ileal como causa infrecuente de hemorragia digestiva de origen oscuro

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8641/2022

Carta

Linfoma intestinal: una lesión endoscópica infrecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8555/2021

Carta

Cecal MALT lymphoma: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8526/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A case of duodenal-type follicular lymphoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8233/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Endoscopic resection of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8232/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Duodenal-type follicular lymphoma: a silent tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8149/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Ink stained gastric lesions: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8141/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neumatosis intestinal idiopática o primaria: un hallazgo casual endoscópico poco frecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8049/2021

Carta

Bochdalek hernia: use of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7760/2020

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Endoscopic forceps removal for complicated magnetic beads impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7731/2020

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Afectación ampollosa esofágica por pénfigo vulgar

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7417/2020

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Phlebosclerotic colitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain and hematochezia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7358/2020

Revisión

Advanced therapy by device-assisted enteroscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6971/2020

Artículo Especial

Indicadores de calidad de la enteroscopia Procedimiento de la enteroscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6946/2020

Carta

Luetic gastritis: an uncommon cause of gastritis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6870/2020

Carta

Úlcera gástrica por mucormicosis en paciente crítico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6636/2019

Carta

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: how far should we go? Point of view

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6585/2019

Carta

Coriocarcinoma gástrico primario

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6478/2019

Caso Clínico

Primary colon mantle lymphoma: a misleading macroscopic appearance!

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6405/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Jejunal schwannoma detected by video capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6474/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Capsule endoscopy, a useful tool for the diagnosis of a tapeworm infection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6346/2019

Editorial

Unidades de endoscopia, statu quo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6347/2019

Carta

Mastocitosis sistémica diagnosticada endoscópicamente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6246/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Artrodesis cervical penetrada en esófago detectada mediante gastroscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6222/2019

Artículo Especial

La calidad en ecografía digestiva: un aspecto que urge consensuar

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6177/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A rare heterotopic gastric mucosa appearing between the muscularis mucosae and submucosa

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6134/2018

Artículo Especial

Indicadores de calidad en gastroscopia. Procedimiento de la gastroscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6023/2018

Carta

Manejo endoscópico del síndrome de Boerhaave

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6013/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Colorectal penetration by two intrauterine devices

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5974/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neoplasia papilar mucinosa intraductal de conducto principal en un paciente con páncreas divisum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5959/2018

Carta

Use of patency capsule in daily practice

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5952/2018

Editorial

Cribado del cáncer colorrectal y supervivencia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Carta

Symptomatic exfoliative esophagitis induced by dabigatran

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5747/2018

Carta

Endoftalmitis endógena bacteriana tras colonoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5658/2018

Artículo Especial

Endoscopia y sedación: un binomio inseparable para el gastroenterólogo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5585/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Dysphagia and hematemesis caused by an intramural esophageal dissection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5471/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Aportación de la colonoscopia virtual en un caso de invaginación intestinal

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5261/2017

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A bull horn fragment found on colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5020/2017

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Metástasis de dermatofibrosarcoma diagnosticada mediante cápsula endoscópica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.4900/2017

Editorial

Asignatura pendiente: minimizar la ansiedad precolonoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4756/2016

Carta al Editor

Retención sintomática de cápsula degradable Agile®

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4691/2016

Carta al Editor

Ball valve syndrome caused by a giant gastric Vanek’s tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4526/2016

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Dispositivo intrauterino en cavidad rectal

Original

Coping with celiac disease: how heavy is the burden for caregivers?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4518/2016

Original

Estudio multicéntrico de seguridad en endoscopia bariátrica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4499/2016

Carta al Editor

Extracción endoscópica de paquete de hachís

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4504/2016

Carta al Editor

Primary chancre in the rectum: an underdiagnosed cause of rectal ulcer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4457/2016

Carta al Editor

Whipple’s disease under the vision of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4362/2016

Carta al Editor

About human taeniasis and Taenia saginata diagnosis by endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4297/2016

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Jejunal metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neumatosis quística intestinal

Carta al Editor

Resección endoscópica submucosa transanal (TASER) mediante sistema TEO

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4154/2015

Carta al Editor

Rotura esplénica tras colonoscopia de cribado de cáncer colorrectal

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3714/2015

Caso Clínico

Diagnóstico atípico mediante cápsula endoscópica: enfermedad de Whipple

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3718/2015

Instrucciones para citar
Fernández-Urien I, Argüelles-Arias F, Alonso-Aguirre P, Júdez J, Bermejo B. A survey-based analysis on endoscopic quality indicators compliance among Spanish endoscopists. 4705/2016


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 810 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 125 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 01/11/2016

Aceptado: 19/12/2016

Prepublicado: 22/12/2016

Publicado: 03/01/2017

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 47 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 51 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 63 días


Compartir
Este artículo ha sido valorado por 1 lectores .
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2026 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas