Año 2017 / Volumen 109 / Número 6
Artículo Especial
Indicadores de calidad en endoscopia digestiva: introducción a los indicadores comunes de estructura, proceso y resultado

435-450

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5035/2017

Julio López-Picazo, Fernando Alberca de las Parras, Antonio Sánchez del Río, Shirley Pérez Romero, Joaquín León Molina, Francisco Javier Júdez,

Resumen
El objetivo general del proyecto en el que se inscribe este trabajo es proponer procedimientos e indicadores de calidad y seguridad útiles para facilitar la mejora de la calidad en unidades de Endoscopia Digestiva. En este primer resultado se proponen procedimientos e indicadores comunes a las pruebas de endoscopia digestiva. Primero, se ha diseñado un diagrama de los pasos previos y consecutivos a la realización de la endoscopia digestiva. Un grupo de expertos en calidad asistencial y/o endoscopia, bajo el amparo de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, han realizado una revisión cualitativa de la literatura haciendo referencia a la búsqueda de indicadores de calidad en los procedimientos endoscópicos. Posteriormente, por un procedimiento de análisis por pares se ha hecho la selección y análisis de la literatura seleccionada. Se ha identificado un total de 20 indicadores, de los cuales siete son de estructura; once, de proceso (cinco de preprocedimiento, tres de procedimiento y tres de posprocedimiento); y dos, de resultado. Se ha analizado la calidad de la evidencia de cada uno de ellos aplicando la clasificación utilizada en GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Michigan: Health Administration Press; 1980.
2. America IoMUCoQoHCi. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. In: Press NA, editor. Washington2000.
3. Donabedian A. Basic approaches to assessment: What to assess. Exploration, structure, process and outcomes Ouality assessment and monitoring, vol 1. Michigan: Health Administration Press Ann Arbor; 1980. p. 79-122.
4. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004; 4(1): 38. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615589
5. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005; 5(1): 25. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15788089
6. Godolphin W. The role of risk communication in shared decision making. BMJ. 2003; 327(7417): 692-3. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14512449
7. Ley 41/2002, de 14 de noviembre, básica reguladora de la autonomía del paciente y de derechos y obligaciones en materia de información y documentación clínica, (2002). Accesible en: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2002/BOE-A-2002-22188-consolidado.pdf
8. Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(1): 3-16. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480102
9. Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2012; 44(4): 444-51. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22438159
10. Armstrong D, Barkun A, Bridges R, et al. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012; 26(1): 17-31. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22308578
11. Gargoum FS, O'Keeffe ST. Readability and content of patient information leaflets for endoscopic procedures. Ir J Med Sci. 2014; 183(3): 429-32. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174395
12. Calle-Urra JE, Parra-Hidalgo P, Saturno-Hernández PJ, et al. [Formal quality assessment of informed consent documents in 9 hospitals]. Rev Calid Asist. 2013; 28(4): 234-43. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23867613
13. Barrio-Cantalejo IM, Simón-Lorda P, Melguizo M, et al. [Validation of the INFLESZ scale to evaluate readability of texts aimed at the patient]. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008; 31(2): 135-52. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18953362
14. Becker RC, Scheiman J, Dauerman HL, et al. Management of platelet-directed pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease undergoing elective endoscopic gastrointestinal procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(12): 2903-17. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19935784
15. Allen JI. Quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012; 28(5): 442-50. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22759591
16. Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Gan SI, et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(6): 1060-70. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889407
17. Veitch AM, Baglin TP, Gershlick AH. Guidelines for the management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gut. 2008; 57(9):1322-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469092
18. Parras FA. Clinical practice guidelines for managing coagulation in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010; 102(2): 124-38. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361848
19. Boustière C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G, et al. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011; 43(5): 445-61. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21547880
20. James PD, Antonova L, Martel M, et al. Measures of trainee performance in advanced endoscopy: A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 30(3): 421-52. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27345650
21. Dominitz JA, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA, et al. Renewal of and proctoring for endoscopic privileges. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67(1): 10-6. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18045594
22. Anderson JT. Assessments and skills improvement for endoscopists. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 30(3): 453-71. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27345651
23. Burls A. AGREE II-improving the quality of clinical care. Lancet. 2010; 376(9747): 1128-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20599263
24. Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Moreno de Vega V, Doménech E, et al. Endoscopist experience as a risk factor for colonoscopic complications. Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12(10 Online): e273-7. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930145
25. Fracchia M, Senore C, Armaroli P, et al. Assessment of the multiple components of the variability in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and lessons for training. Endoscopy. 2010; 42(6): 448-55. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20414864
26. Calderwood AH, Chapman FJ, Cohen J, et al. Guidelines for safety in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79(3): 363-72. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24485393
27. Lieberman D, Nadel M, Smith RA, et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65(6): 757-66. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17466195
28. Beaulieu D, Barkun AN, Dubé C, et al. Endoscopy reporting standards. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013; 27(5): 286-92. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712304
29. de Lange T, Moum BA, Tholfsen JK, et al. Standardization and quality of endoscopy text reports in ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(10): 835-40. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14551861
30. Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC. Quality metrics in endoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013; 9(4): 228-33. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24711767
31. Simón MA, Bordas JM, Campo R, et al. [Consensus document of the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology on sedoanalgesia in digestive endoscopy]. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 29(3): 131-49. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507280
32. Groenen MJ, Kuipers EJ, van Berge Henegouwen GP, et al. Computerisation of endoscopy reports using standard reports and text blocks. Neth J Med. 2006; 64(3): 78-83. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16547359
33. Nelson DB. Infectious disease complications of GI endoscopy: part II, exogenous infections. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57(6): 695-711. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12709700
34. Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118(2): 117-28. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8416308
35. Cleaning and disinfection of equipment for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Report of a Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee. Gut. 1998; 42(4): 585-93. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9616326
36. Banerjee S, Shen B, Nelson DB, et al. Infection control during GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008; 67(6): 781-90. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18355826
37. Bordas JM, Pou Fernández JM, Nieto M, et al. [Disinfection in digestive endoscopy. Current state and recommendations]. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 22(3): 157-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10228328
38. Alvarado CJ, Reichelderfer M. APIC guideline for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Am J Infect Control. 2000; 28(2): 138-55. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10760223
39. Kruse A, Rey JF, Beilenhoff U. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) - The European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Guidelines on Cleaning and Disinfection in GI Endoscopy - Update 1999 - Protocol for the Reprocessing of Endoscopy Accessories. Endoscopy. 2000; 32(1): 76-83. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10691277
40. Rey JF. Protocol for reprocessing endoscopic accessories. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2000; 32(1): 81-3. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10691278
41. Nelson DB, Barkun AN, Block KP, et al. Technology status evaluation report. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy. May 2001. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54(6): 824-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11726877
42. Rey JF, Kruse A, Neumann C, et al. ESGE/ESGENA technical note on cleaning and disinfection. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(10): 869-77. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14551869
43. Rey JF, Kruse A, Endoscopy) EESoG. Cleaning and disinfection in Europe according to the Endoscopic Societies' Guidelines. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(10): 878-81. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14551870
44. Endoscopy ASfG. Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58(1): 1-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838212
45. Argaña A, Hernández‐Soto E. Recomendaciones AEEED Limpieza y Desinfección en Endoscopia Gastrointestinal. In: Digestiva AEEE, editor.: Madrid; 2013. Accesible en: http://aeeed.com/documentos/publicos/Recomendaciones%20AEEED%20Limpieza%20y%20desinfecci%C3%B3n%20en%20Endoscopia%20Gastrointestinal.pdf.
46. Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates Ic. Guideline for the use of high-level disinfectants and sterilants for reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2000; 23(4): 180-7. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11310086
47. Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates Ic. Standards of infection control in reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2000; 23(4): 172-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11310085
48. Santolaria S, Ducons J, Bordas JM, et al. [Cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy]. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 30(1): 25-35. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17266879
49. Cronmiller JR, Nelson DK, Salman G, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of endoscopic disinfection procedures: a controlled, multifactorial investigation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50(2): 152-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10425405
50. Foliente RL, Kovacs BJ, Aprecio RM, et al. Efficacy of high-level disinfectants for reprocessing GI endoscopes in simulated-use testing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53(4): 456-62. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11275886
51. Bordas JM, Marcos-Maeso MA, Perez MJ, et al. GI flexible endoscope disinfection: "in use" test comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005; 52(63): 800-7. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15966208
52. SANTOS S J, MONTORO M. Medidas de esterilización de endoscopios y material endoscópico accesorio. GH CONTINUADA. 2004; 2(4): 167-70. Accesible en: http://aeeh.es/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/v2n4a130pdf001.pdf
53. González Thompson J, De la Torre Bravo A, Abdo Francis J, et al. Primer Consenso Mexicano sobre Calidad en Endoscopia Gastrointestinal. Asociación Mexicana de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal. Endoscopia. 2011; 23(4): 195-201.
54. Croffie J, Carpenter S, Chuttani R, et al. ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: disposable endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62(4): 477-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16185955
55. Alfa MJ, Sepehri S, Olson N, et al. Establishing a clinically relevant bioburden benchmark: a quality indicator for adequate reprocessing and storage of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40(3): 233-6. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21704429
56. Facilities IH. Clinical Practice Parameters and Facility Standards. In: Ontario CoPaSo, editor. Ontario2006. Accesible en: http://www.spitjudms.ro/_files/protocoale_terapeutice/radiologie/endoscopybook.pdf.
57. Palanca I, Colomer J. Unidades asistenciales del aparato digestivo. Estándares y recomendaciones de calidad y seguridad. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Centro De Publicaciones; 2013. Accesible en: http://www.msssi.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/EEyRR_org.htm
58. Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(6): 1127-31. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624807
59. Juillerat P, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Vader JP, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Presentation of methodology, general results, and analysis of complications. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(3): 240-6. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19280536
60. Arditi C, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(3): 209-17. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19280532
61. Arditi C, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Burnand B, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(3): 200-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19280531
62. Schussele Filliettaz S, Gonvers JJ, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Functional bowel disorders: pain, constipation and bloating. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(3): 234-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19280535
63. Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Arditi C, Froehlich F, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Iron-deficiency anemia and hematochezia. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(3): 227-33. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19280534
64. Schusselé Filliettaz S, Juillerat P, Burnand B, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Chronic diarrhea and known inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(3): 218-26. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19280533
65. Adler DG, Lieb JG, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(1): 54-66. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25480099
66. Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Haringsma J, et al. Quality evaluation through self-assessment: a novel method to gain insight into ERCP performance. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014; 5(1): 10-6. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416502
67. Costamagna G, Familiari P, Marchese M, et al. Endoscopic biliopancreatic investigations and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 22(5): 865-81. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18790436
68. Froehlich F, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, et al. Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE). Endoscopy. 2006; 38(5): 461-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16767580
69. de Bosset V, Froehlich F, Rey JP, et al. Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy? Endoscopy. 2002; 34(5): 360-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11972266
70. Bersani G, Rossi A, Ricci G, et al. Do ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy enhance the probability of finding relevant pathologies in an open access service? Dig Liver Dis. 2005; 37(8): 609-14. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15996629
71. Morini S, Hassan C, Meucci G, et al. Diagnostic yield of open access colonoscopy according to appropriateness. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54(2): 175-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11474386
72. Charles RJ, Chak A, Cooper GS, et al. Use of open access in GI endoscopy at an academic medical center. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50(4): 480-5. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10502167
73. López-Picazo JJ, Tomás-Garcia N, Calle-Urra JE, et al. [Introduction of an accreditation system for hospital informed consent forms]. Rev Calid Asist. 2015; 30(2): 55-63. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25724754
74. Kopacova M, Bures J. Informed consent for digestive endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 4(6): 227-30. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22720123
75. Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K, et al. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (7): CD009445. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23832767
76. Quality improvement of gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for clinical application. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 49(6): 842-4. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10343248
77. Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(4): 866-72. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16635230
78. Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, et al. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2008; 68(5): 815-26. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18984096
79. Alberca-de-Las-Parras F, Marín F, Roldán-Schilling V, et al. Management of antithrombotic drugs in association with endoscopic procedures. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015; 107(5): 289-306. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25952804
80. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Guideline on the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55(7): 775-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12024126
81. Zuckerman MJ, Hirota WK, Adler DG, et al. ASGE guideline: the management of low-molecular-weight heparin and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61(2): 189-94. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15729224
82. Alberca de Las Parras F, Egea Valenzuela J, Carballo Álvarez F. Bleeding risk in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Impact of the use of antithrombotic drugs. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112960
83. Devereaux PJ, Anderson DR, Gardner MJ, et al. Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study. BMJ. 2001; 323(7323): 1218-22. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11719412
84. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63(4 Suppl): S16-28. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16564908
85. Rey JF, Lambert R, Committee EQA. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001; 33(10): 901-3. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11605605
86. Rex DK. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51(4 Pt 1): 451-9. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10744818
87. Asfeldt AM, Straume B, Paulssen EJ. Impact of observer variability on the usefulness of endoscopic images for the documentation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42(9): 1106-12. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17710678
88. Non-Anesthesiologists ASoATFoSaAb. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96(4): 1004-17. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11964611
89. Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK, et al. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58(3): 317-22. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14528201
90. Barnett S, Hung A, Tsao R, et al. Capnographic Monitoring of Moderate Sedation During Low-Risk Screening Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Safety or Patient Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111(3): 388-94. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26832654
91. Adler DG. Consent, common adverse events, and post-adverse event actions in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015; 25(1): 1-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25442954
92. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71(3): 446-54. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20189503
93. Borgaonkar MR, Hookey L, Hollingworth R, et al. Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012; 26(2): 71-8. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22312605
94. Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: cardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(3): 579-85. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21353857
95. Lugay M, Otto G, Kong M, et al. Recovery time and safe discharge of endoscopy patients after conscious sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1996; 19(6): 194-200. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9025398
96. Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, et al. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66(1): 27-34. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17591470
97. Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part II: noncardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(3): 586-97. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21353858
98. Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145(12): 880-6. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17179057
99. Ko CW, Riffle S, Michaels L, et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 8(2): 166-73. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19850154
100. Fehmi SMA, Choksi N, Saini SD, et al. Risk of Perforation During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136(5): A39-A.
101. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, et al. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55(3): 307-14. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11868001
102. Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(2): 190-4. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145595
103. Shi H, Chen S, Swar G, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a review and meta-analysis. Pancreas. 2013; 42(7): 1093-100. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23867366
104. Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012; 44(10): 940-51. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22987214
105. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7(1): 89-91. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7772368
106. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970; 49(6): 924-34. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5534693
107. Willey J, Vargo JJ, Connor JT, et al. Quantitative assessment of psychomotor recovery after sedation and analgesia for outpatient EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(6): 810-6. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12447290
108. White PF, Song D. New criteria for fast-tracking after outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with the modified Aldrete's scoring system. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88(5): 1069-72. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10320170
109. Fatima H, Rex DK. Minimizing endoscopic complications: colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007; 17(1): 145-56, viii. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17397781
110. Spodik M, Goldman J, Merli K, et al. Providing an endoscopy report to patients after a procedure: a low-cost intervention with high returns. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67(1): 103-11. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18155431
111. Rasool S, Ahmed S, Siddiqui S, et al. Evaluation of quality and patient satisfaction during endoscopic procedure: a cross sectional study from south Asian country. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010; 60(12): 990-5. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21381548
112. Parra Hidalgo P, Bermejo Alegría RM, Más Castillo A, et al. [Factors related to patient satisfaction with hospital emergency services]. Gac Sanit. 2012; 26(2): 159-65. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000867
113. López-Picazo JJ, de Dios Cánovas-García J, Antúnez C, et al. Perceived quality in a dementia unit: patients' caregivers as information providers. Neurologia. 2016. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27780616
114. Group JA. Global Rating Scale. Accesible en: https://www.jagaccreditation.org.
115. Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, de Man RA, et al. The Global Rating Scale in clinical practice: a comprehensive quality assurance programme for endoscopy departments. Dig Liver Dis. 2012; 44(11): 919-24. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22840567
116. MacIntosh D, Dubé C, Hollingworth R, et al. The endoscopy Global Rating Scale-Canada: development and implementation of a quality improvement tool. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013; 27(2): 74-82. Accesible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472242
Artículos relacionados

Carta

Linfoma MALT de colon: un desafío endoscópico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9595/2023

Carta

Amiloidosis intestinal: un reto diagnóstico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8934/2022

Carta

Íleo biliar resuelto por endoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8898/2022

Carta

Angiosarcoma de aorta diagnosticado mediante ecoendoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8879/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Metaplasia epidermoide de esófago: una entidad infrecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8708/2022

Carta

Mesotelioma decidual maligno, ¿hasta dónde llegamos con USE?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8352/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neumatosis intestinal idiopática o primaria: un hallazgo casual endoscópico poco frecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8049/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Afectación ampollosa esofágica por pénfigo vulgar

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7417/2020

Artículo Especial

Indicadores de calidad de la enteroscopia Procedimiento de la enteroscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6946/2020

Carta

Úlcera gástrica por mucormicosis en paciente crítico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6636/2019

Carta

Coriocarcinoma gástrico primario

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6478/2019

Editorial

Unidades de endoscopia, statu quo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6347/2019

Carta

Mastocitosis sistémica diagnosticada endoscópicamente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6246/2019

Artículo Especial

La calidad en ecografía digestiva: un aspecto que urge consensuar

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6177/2019

Artículo Especial

Indicadores de calidad en gastroscopia. Procedimiento de la gastroscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6023/2018

Carta

Manejo endoscópico del síndrome de Boerhaave

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6013/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neoplasia papilar mucinosa intraductal de conducto principal en un paciente con páncreas divisum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5959/2018

Carta

A veces las cosas son lo que parecen

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5911/2018

Artículo Especial

Endoscopia y sedación: un binomio inseparable para el gastroenterólogo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5585/2018

Carta

Estudio de masa pancreática: no todo es lo que parece

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5527/2018

Editorial

Aparato digestivo; una especialidad histórica con mucho futuro

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5193/2017

Carta al Editor

Neoplasia neuroendocrina rectal

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4836/2017

Original

Estudio multicéntrico de seguridad en endoscopia bariátrica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4499/2016

Carta al Editor

Extracción endoscópica de paquete de hachís

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4504/2016

Carta al Editor

Resección endoscópica submucosa transanal (TASER) mediante sistema TEO

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4154/2015

Instrucciones para citar
López-Picazo J, Alberca de las Parras F, Sánchez del Río A, Pérez Romero S, León Molina J, Júdez F, et all. Indicadores de calidad en endoscopia digestiva: introducción a los indicadores comunes de estructura, proceso y resultado. 5035/2017


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 1296 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 1296 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 28/04/2017

Aceptado: 08/05/2017

Prepublicado: 29/05/2017

Publicado: 01/06/2017

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 5 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 31 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 34 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas