Year 2018 / Volume 110 / Number 2
Original
Anal cytology, histopathology and anoscopy in an anal dysplasia screening program: is anal cytology enough?

109-114

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4913/2017

Marco Silva, Armando Peixoto, José Alexandre Sarmento, Rosa Coelho, Guilherme Macedo,

Abstract
Background and aim: The human papilloma virus is the leading cause of anal squamous cell carcinoma. Cytological screening may reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to estimate the agreement between anal cytological examination, histopathology and anoscopic visual impression. Methods: A prospective study of patients who underwent anal dysplasia screening between 2011 and 2015, in a proctology clinic of a tertiary referral center. Results: During the study period, 141 patients (91% men, 87% with HIV infection) underwent 175 anal cytology tests. Of these, 33% were negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), 22% were atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS), 33% were low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 12% were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). With regard to anoscopic visual impression, 46% of patients had no lesions and excision/biopsy of the identified lesions was performed in the remaining patients. The weighted kappa-agreement between abnormal cytological results and anoscopic visual impression was moderate (k = 0.48). The weighted kappa-agreement between simultaneous anal cytological examinations and anal histopathologic findings was low (kappa = 0.20). With regard to the histological examination of cases with HSIL or superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma, 64% of patients had dysplasia of a lower grade according to the cytological analysis (6 ASCUS, 18 LSIL and 4 NILM). Conclusion: There was a poor correlation between anal cytology, histopathology and anoscopic visual impression and a high number of histological studies of HGD that were of a lower dysplastic degree according to the cytological examination. Therefore, anal cytology screening should not be used as the sole method of anal dysplasia screening.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1- Elorza G, Saralegui Y, Enríquez-Navascués JM, et al. Anal intraepitelial neoplasia: A narrative review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2016; 108: 31-9.
2- Glynne-Jones R, Nilsson PJ, Aschele C, et al; ESMO; ESSO; ESTRO. Anal cancer: ESMO–ESSO–ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111: 330-9.
3- Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136: 1266-97.
4- Hillman RJ, Cuming T, Darragh T, et al. 2016 IANS International Guidelines for Practice Standards in the Detection of Anal Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2016; 20: 283-91.
5- Wells JS, Holstad MM, Thomas T, et al. An Integrative Review of Guidelines for Anal Cancer Screening in HIV-Infected Persons. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2014; 28: 350-7.
6- Ortoski RA, Kell CS. Anal Cancer and Screening Guidelines for Human Papillomavirus in Men. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2011; 111: S35-43.
7- Shridhar R, Shibata D, Chan E, et al. Anal Cancer: Current Standards in Care and Recent Changes in Practice. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 139-62.
8- Crawshaw BP, Russ AJ, Stein SL, et al. High-Resolution Anoscopy or Expectant Management for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia for the Prevention of Anal Cancer: Is There Really a Difference? Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58: 53-9.
9- Jay N, Berry JM, Hogeboom CJ, et al. Colposcopic appearance of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions: relationship to histopathology. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 919-28.
10- Goldstone SE. High-resolution anoscopy is a crucial component of anal dysplasia screening. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53 :364-5.
11- Dalla Pria A, Alfa-Wali M, Fox P, et al. High-resolution anoscopy screening of HIV-positive MSM: longitudinal results from a pilot study. AIDS 2014; 28: 861-7.
12- Richel O, Hallensleben ND, Kreuter A, et al. High-resolution anoscopy: clinical features of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 1237-42.
13- Silvera R, Gaisa MM, Goldstone SE. Random biopsy during high-resolution anoscopy increases diagnosis of anal highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 65: 65–71.
14- Solomon D, Nayar R, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. NewYork: Springer 2004;191 p.
15- Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. New York: Springer. 2015.
16- Grulich AE, Poynten IM, Machalek DA, et al. The epidemiology of anal cancer. Sex Health 2012; 9: 504–8.
17- Jin F, Grulich AE, Poynten IM, et al. The Performance of Anal Cytology as a Screening Test for Anal HSILs in Homosexual Men. Cancer Cytopathol 2016; 124: 415-24.
18- Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Hogeboom CJ, et al. Anal cytology as a screening tool for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1997; 14: 415-22.
19- Nyitray A, Nielson CM, Harris RB, et al. Prevalence of and risk factor for anal human papillomavirus infection in heterosexual men. J Infect Dis 2008; 197: 1676-84.
20- Palefsky JM, Holly EA. Immunosuppression and coinfection with HIV. JNCI Monographs 2003; 2003: 41-6.
21- Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Hogeboom CJ, et al. Virologic, immunologic, and clinical parameters in the incidence and progression of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive and HIV-negative homosexual men. J Acq Immune Def Syndr Human Retrovirol 1998; 17: 314-9.
22- Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Ralston ML, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for anal human Papillomavirus infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive and highrisk HIV-negative women. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 383-91.
23- Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Efirdc JT, et al. Anal intraepithelial neoplasia in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era among HIVpositive men who have sex with men. AIDS 2005; 19: 1407-14.
24- Patel J, Salit IE, Berry MJ, et al. Environmental scan of anal cancer screening practices: worldwide survey results. Cancer Med 2014; 3: 1052-61.
25- Roberts JM, Thurloe JK. Comparison of the performance of anal cytology
and cervical cytology as screening tests. Sex Health 2012; 9: 568-73.
26- Darragh TM, Winkler B. Screening for anal neoplasia: anal cytology – sampling, processing and reporting. Sex Health 2012; 9: 556-61.
27- Mathews WC, Cachay ER, Caperna J, et al. Estimating the accuracy of anal cytology in the presence of an imperfect reference standard. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e12284.
28- Factor SH, Cooperstein A, Pereira GA, et al. Are colon and rectal surgeons ready to screen for anal dysplasia? Results of a survey on attitudes and practice. Sex Transm Dis 2014; 41: 246-53.
29- Berry-Lawhorn JM, Chrobak D, Jay N, et al. Who is ready to screen for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and why should they perform high-resolution anoscopy? Sex Transm Dis 2014; 41: 254–6.
30- Berry JM, Palefsky JM, Jay N, et al. Performance characteristics of anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing in patients with high-resolution anoscopy guided biopsy of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 239-47.
31- Swedish KA, Lee EQ, Goldstone SE. The changing picture of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in men who have sex with men: the effects of 10 years of experience performing highresolution anoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1003-7.
32- Hillman RJ, Gunathilake MP, Jin F, et al. Ability to detect high grade squamous anal intraepithelial lesions at high resolution anoscopy-improves over time. Sex Health 2016; 13: 177-81.
33- Darragh TM, Winkler B. Anal cancer and cervical cancer screening: key differences. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2011; 119: 5–19.
34- Leeds IL, Fang SH. Anal cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia screening: A review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8: 41-51.
35- Betancourt EM, Wahbah MM, Been LC, et al. Anal Cytology as a Predictor of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Positive Men and Women. Diagn Cytopathol 2013; 41: 697-702.
36- Chiao EY, Giordano TP, Palefsky JM, et al. Screening HIVinfected individuals for anal cancer precursor lesions: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43: 223-33.
37- Bean SM, Chhieng DC. Anal-rectal cytology: a review. Diagn Cytopathol
2010; 38: 538-46.
38- Chin-Hong PV, Berry JM, Cheng SC, et al. Comparison of patient- and clinician-collected anal cytology samples to screen for human papillomavirus-associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia in men who have sex with men. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 300-6.
Related articles

Letter

Anal neoplasia and perianal Crohn’s disease: myth or reality?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8317/2021

Editorial

Screening guide for hepatitis C virus infection in Spain

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7728/2020

Review

New non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7233/2020

Special Article

Strategy for the Elimination of Hepatitis C in Cantabria

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7108/2020

Editorial

Colorectal cancer screening and survival

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Letter

Why anal cytology is not enough in a dysplasia screening program

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5678/2018

Review

Anal Intraepithelial neoplasia: A narrative review

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3788/2015

Citation tools
Silva M, Peixoto A, Sarmento J, Coelho R, Macedo G. Anal cytology, histopathology and anoscopy in an anal dysplasia screening program: is anal cytology enough?. 4913/2017


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 281 visits.
This article has been downloaded 281 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 23/02/2017

Accepted: 18/10/2017

Online First: 23/11/2017

Published: 31/01/2018

Article revision time: 231 days

Article Online First time: 273 days

Article editing time: 342 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology