Año 2023 / Volumen 115 / Número 1
Artículo Especial
Spanish Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (SIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 20 000 cases

22-34

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9322/2022

Eduardo Espinet Coll, Andrés J. del Pozo García, Román Turró Arau, Javier Nebreda Durán, Xavier Cortés Rizo, Andrés Serrano Jiménez, Miguel Ángel Escartí Usó, María Muñoz Tornero, David Carral Martínez, Jaime Bernabéu López, Cristian Sierra Bernal, David Martínez-Ares, Jesús Espinel Díez, Carlos Marra-López Valenciano, Javier Sola Vera, Laura Sanchis Artero, José Luis Domínguez Jiménez, Ramiro Carreño Macián, José Francisco Juanmartiñena Fernández, Arnulfo Fernández Zulueta, Claudia Consiglieri Alvarado, Eduardo Grecco, Lyz Bezerra Silva, Manoel Galvao Neto,

Resumen
Background: intragastric balloons (IGBs) are a minimally invasive, increasingly popular option for obesity treatment. However, there is only one worldwide guideline standardizing the technical aspects of the procedure (BIBC, SOARD 2018). Objectives: to construct a practical guideline for IGB usage by reproducing and expanding the BIBC survey among the Spanish Bariatric Endoscopy Group (GETTEMO). Methods: a 140-question survey was submitted to all GETTEMO members. Twenty-one Spanish experienced endoscopists in IGBs answered back. Eight topics on patient selection, indications/contraindications, technique, multidisciplinary follow-up, results, safety, and financial/legal aspects were discussed. Consensus was defined as consensus ≥ 70 %. Results: overall data included 20 680 IGBs including 12 different models. Mean age was 42.0 years-old, 79.9 % were women, and the mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 34.05 kg/m². Indication in BMI > 25 kg/m², 10 absolute contraindications, and nutritional and medication measures at follow-up were settled. A mean %TBWL (total body weight loss) of 17.66 % ± 2.5 % was observed. Early removal rate due to intolerance was 3.62 %. Adverse event rate was 0.70 % and 6.37 % for major and minor complications with consensual management. A single case of mortality occurred. IGBs were placed in private health, prior contract, and with full and single payment at the beginning. Seven lawsuits (0.034 %) were received, all ran through civil proceeding, and with favorable final resolution. Conclusions: this consensus based on more than 20 000 cases represents practical recommendations to perform IGB procedures. This experience shows that the device leads to satisfactory weight loss with a low rate of adverse events. Most results are reproducible compared to those obtained by the BIBC.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
[1] Galvao Neto M, Bezerra Silva L, Grecco E, et al. Brazilian Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (BIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 40,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018;14:151-161.
[2] Nieben OG, Harboe H. Intragastric balloon as an artificial bezoar for treatment of obesity. Lancet 1982;1(8265):198–9.
[3] Hogan RB, Johnston JH, Long BW, et al. A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of the gastric bubble for obesity. Gastrointest Endosc 1989;35:381-5.
[4] Schapiro M, Benjamin S, Blackburn G, et al. Obesity and the gastric balloon: a comprehensive workshop. Tarpon Springs, Florida, March 19-21, 1987. Gastrointest Endosc 1987;33:323-7.
[5] Ali MR, Moustarah F, Kim JJ. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on intragastric balloon therapy endorsed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:462–7.
[6] Abu Dayyeh BK, Kumar N, Edmundowicz SA, et al. ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;82:425–38.
[7] Imaz I, Martinez-Cervell C, Garcia-Alvarez EE, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2008;18:841–6.
[8] Dumonceau JM. Evidence-based review of the Bioenterics intragastric balloon for weight loss. Obes Surg 2008;18:1611–7.
[9] Moura D, Oliveira J, De Moura EG, et al. .Effectiveness of intragastric balloon for obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:420-9.
[10] Genco A, López-Nava G, Wahlen C, et al. Multi-centre European experience with intragastric balloon in overweight populations: 13 years of experience. Obes Surg 2013;23:515-21.
[11] Tanaka Kotinda APS, Hourneaux de Moura DT, Igor Braga Ribeiro I. Efficacy of Intragastric Balloons for Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Obes Surg 2020;30:2743-2753.
[12] Zerrweck C, Maunoury V, Caiazzo R, et al. Preoperative weight loss with intragastric balloon decreases the risk of significant adverse outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass in super-super obese patients. Obes Surg 2012;22:777–82.
[13] Eduardo Espinet Coll, Gontrand López-Nava Breviere, Javier Nebreda Durán, et al. Spanish Consensus Document on Bariatric Endoscopy. Part 1. General considerations. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018;110:386-399.
[14] Espinet Coll E, López-Nava Breviere G, Nebreda Durán J, et al. Spanish Consensus Document on Bariatric Endoscopy. Part 2: specific endoscopic treatments. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2019;111:140-154.
[15] Martínez MÁ, Cancer E, Bretón I, et al. Intragastric balloon: a review concerning alternative balloons compared to the classical ones (bioenterics). Nutr Hosp 2014;31: 84-91.
[16] Espinet-Coll E, Nebreda-Durán J, Gómez-Valero JA, et al. Current endoscopic techniques in the treatment of obesity. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012;104:72-87.
[17] Abu-Dayyeh BK, Sarmiento R, Rajan E, et al. Endoscopic treatments of obesity and metabolic disease: Are we there yet? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2014;106:467-476.
[18] Tsesmeli N, Coumaros D. Review of endoscopic devices for weight reduction: old and new balloons and implantable prostheses. Endoscopy 2009;41:1082-9.
[19] De Castro ML, Morales MJ, Del Campo V, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of two types of intragastric balloons placed in obese subjects: a double-blind comparative study. Obes Surg 2010;20:1642–6.
[20] Stavrou G, Shrewsbury A, Kotzampassi K. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021;13:238-259.
Artículos relacionados

Carta

Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9913/2023

Carta

Calcifying fibrous tumor and pathological analysis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9739/2023

Carta

Endoscopic observation of a rare duodenal tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9679/2023

Carta

Linfoma MALT de colon: un desafío endoscópico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9595/2023

Carta

Isolated Jejunal Crohn's Disease: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9423/2022

Carta

New technique for the endoscopic removal of long foreign bodies

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9398/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Whipple’s disease – A typical endoscopic finding of a rare disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9338/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A rare endoscopic pattern in a patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9124/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Esophageal tuberculosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9108/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Esophagopleural fistula due to empyema necessitans

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9085/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Pneumatosis intestinalis: a rare endoscopic feature of colonic ischemia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8980/2022

Carta

¿Melanoma intestinal primario?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8944/2022

Carta

Amiloidosis intestinal: un reto diagnóstico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8934/2022

Carta

Íleo biliar resuelto por endoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8898/2022

Carta

Digestive tract MALT lymphoma, an unusual location

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8800/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Metaplasia epidermoide de esófago: una entidad infrecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8708/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Tumor neuroendocrino ileal como causa infrecuente de hemorragia digestiva de origen oscuro

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8641/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A case of duodenal-type follicular lymphoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8233/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Endoscopic resection of a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8232/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Duodenal-type follicular lymphoma: a silent tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8149/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neumatosis intestinal idiopática o primaria: un hallazgo casual endoscópico poco frecuente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8049/2021

Carta

Bochdalek hernia: use of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7760/2020

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Endoscopic forceps removal for complicated magnetic beads impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7731/2020

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Afectación ampollosa esofágica por pénfigo vulgar

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7417/2020

Revisión

Advanced therapy by device-assisted enteroscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6971/2020

Carta

Luetic gastritis: an uncommon cause of gastritis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6870/2020

Carta

Úlcera gástrica por mucormicosis en paciente crítico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6636/2019

Carta

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: how far should we go? Point of view

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6585/2019

Carta

Coriocarcinoma gástrico primario

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6478/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Jejunal schwannoma detected by video capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6474/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Capsule endoscopy, a useful tool for the diagnosis of a tapeworm infection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6346/2019

Editorial

Unidades de endoscopia, statu quo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6347/2019

Carta

Mastocitosis sistémica diagnosticada endoscópicamente

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6246/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

A rare heterotopic gastric mucosa appearing between the muscularis mucosae and submucosa

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6134/2018

Artículo Especial

Indicadores de calidad en gastroscopia. Procedimiento de la gastroscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6023/2018

Carta

Manejo endoscópico del síndrome de Boerhaave

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6013/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Neoplasia papilar mucinosa intraductal de conducto principal en un paciente con páncreas divisum

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5959/2018

Carta

Use of patency capsule in daily practice

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5952/2018

Carta

Symptomatic exfoliative esophagitis induced by dabigatran

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5747/2018

Artículo Especial

Endoscopia y sedación: un binomio inseparable para el gastroenterólogo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5585/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Dysphagia and hematemesis caused by an intramural esophageal dissection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5471/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Metástasis de dermatofibrosarcoma diagnosticada mediante cápsula endoscópica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.4900/2017

Carta al Editor

Retención sintomática de cápsula degradable Agile®

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4691/2016

Original

Utilidad del balón intragástrico previo a cirugía bariátrica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4624/2016

Carta al Editor

Ball valve syndrome caused by a giant gastric Vanek’s tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4526/2016

Original

Estudio multicéntrico de seguridad en endoscopia bariátrica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4499/2016

Carta al Editor

Extracción endoscópica de paquete de hachís

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4504/2016

Carta al Editor

Whipple’s disease under the vision of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4362/2016

Carta al Editor

About human taeniasis and Taenia saginata diagnosis by endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4297/2016

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Jejunal metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

Carta al Editor

Resección endoscópica submucosa transanal (TASER) mediante sistema TEO

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4154/2015

Caso Clínico

Diagnóstico atípico mediante cápsula endoscópica: enfermedad de Whipple

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3718/2015

Instrucciones para citar
Espinet Coll E, del Pozo García A, Turró Arau R, Nebreda Durán J, Cortés Rizo X, Serrano Jiménez A, et all. Spanish Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (SIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 20 000 cases. 9322/2022


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 3438 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 826 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 01/11/2022

Aceptado: 16/11/2022

Prepublicado: 25/11/2022

Publicado: 12/01/2023

Tiempo de prepublicación: 24 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 72 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas