Year 2020 / Volume 112 / Number 4
Original
Efficacy and safety of water-exchange enteroscopy compared to carbon dioxide insufflation during enteroscopy

258-261

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6788/2019

Gerardo Blanco Velasco, Raúl Antonio Zamarripa-Mottú, Roberto Soria-Rodríguez, Omar Michel Solórzano-Pineda, Juan Manuel Blancas Valencia, Enrique Murcio-Pérez, Óscar Víctor Hernandez Mondragón,

Abstract
Introduction: carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation during enteroscopy reduces procedure time and subsequent symptoms and increases the insertion depth compared with room air. In colonoscopy, the water-exchange (WE) technique is associated with less pain compared with CO2 insufflation. The WE technique is not well studied in enteroscopy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of enteroscopy with WE and CO2. Methods: a prospective, comparative and observational study was performed of double balloon enteroscopies (DBE) that were randomized in two groups. The first group used WE while the second group used CO2 insufflation. The data collected was evaluated via univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression (variables with p ≤ 0.10 according to the univariate analysis). Results: forty-six DBE were included; 23 in each arm. The median age of cases was 63.5 years and 37% were female. There were no statistical differences between the groups with regard to the access route, findings, therapy and complications. Four patients (20%) in the CO2 group had adverse events (abdominal distension and pain) and one in the WE group (nausea), which was not statistically significant. The median insertion depth was greater in the CO2 group; 260 cm vs 160 cm (p = 0.048). Multiple logistic regression showed a statistically significant difference in the insertion depth using CO2 insufflation (OR 1.009, 1.001-1.017; p = 0.034). Conclusions: DBE with a CO2 insufflation technique and WE are safe with a greater insertion depth with CO2.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and deviced-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2015;47:352-376.
2. Domagk D, Bretthauer M, Lenz P, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized control, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007;39:1064-1067.
3. Shiani A, Lipka S, Lai A, et al. Carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation during balloon-assisted enteroscopy: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2017;05:E67-E75.
4. Soria F, López-Albors O, Morcillo E, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation safety in double-balloon enteroscopy: An experimental animal study. Dig Endosc 2013;25:39-46.
5. Aquino JCM, Bernardo WM, de Moura DTH, et al. Carbon dioxide versus air insufflation enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Endosc Int Open 2018 ;6:E637-E645.
Garborg K, Kaminski MF, Lindenburger W, et al. Water Exchange versus carbón dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2015;47:192-199. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390795.
7. Anderson JC, Kahi CJ, Sullivan A, et al. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO2: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:591-598.
8. Liang S, Pan Y, Wang B, et al. Complete small-bowel examination by oral single-balloon enteroscopy using the water-exchange method. Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E415-7.
9. Zhang Z, Wu Y, Sun G, et al. Bayesian network meta-analysis: Efficacy of air insufflation, CO2 insufflation, water exchange, and water immersion in colonoscopy. Dig Endosc 2018;30:321-331.
10. Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q, et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbón dioxide insufflation vs room air insufflation for gastrointestnal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35:1145-1154.
11. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Fujimoto A, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide insufflation in balloon-assisted enteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2016;4:11-17.
12. Cadoni S, Hassan C, Frazzoni L, et al. Impact of water exchange colonoscopy on endoscopy room efficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:159-167.
13. Fuccio L, Frazzioni L, Hassan C, et al. Water Exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2018;88:589-597.
Related articles

Digestive Diseases Image

Enteroenteric intussusception caused by a small bowel metastatic cutaneous melanoma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9876/2023

Letter

Isolated Jejunal Crohn's Disease: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9423/2022

Letter

A rare cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9156/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Duodenal-type follicular lymphoma: a silent tumor

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8149/2021

Review

Advanced therapy by device-assisted enteroscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6971/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Gastrointestinal and renal involvement in systemic vasculitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6965/2020

Editorial

Does it matter how long the small bowel is?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6980/2020

Special Article

Quality indicators in enteroscopy. Enteroscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6946/2020

Review

Device-assisted enteroscopy training. A rapid review

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6923/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Enteroscopy in the diagnosis of melanoma metastases

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6820/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

Enteroscopic diagnosis of intestinal malabsorption of a rare etiology: diaphragm disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6723/2019

Letter to the Editor

Symptomatic retention of the Agile® patency capsule

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4691/2016

Letter to the Editor

Whipple’s disease under the vision of capsule endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4362/2016

Letter to the Editor

Asymptomatic bronchial aspiration of capsule endoscope: a significant complication

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4363/2016

Citation tools
Blanco Velasco G, Zamarripa-Mottú R, Soria-Rodríguez R, Solórzano-Pineda O, Blancas Valencia J, Murcio-Pérez E, et all. Efficacy and safety of water-exchange enteroscopy compared to carbon dioxide insufflation during enteroscopy. 6788/2019


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 883 visits.
This article has been downloaded 186 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 03/12/2019

Accepted: 27/01/2020

Online First: 03/03/2020

Published: 07/04/2020

Article revision time: 52 days

Article Online First time: 91 days

Article editing time: 126 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology