Year 2018 / Volume 110 / Number 7
Original
Clinical-endoscopic relevance of incidental colorectal lesions detected by PET-CT

434-439

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.4719/2016

Carmen Garrido Durán, María Antonia Payeras Capó, Carmen García Caparrós, Marta Giménez García, Jaime Daumal Domenech,

Abstract
Aim: to determine the proportion of incidental colon lesions detected by PET-CT and their correlation with the endoscopic and histological findings. In addition, to determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) that can discriminate between benign and malignant lesions in our series of cases. Methods: this was a retrospective study of 3,000 patients evaluated by PET-CT for staging or response to treatment of primary neoplasms, between 2011 and 2015. Patients with incidental uptake in the colon were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included an incomplete, poorly prepared or abandoned colonoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease and treatment with metformin. Results: the study cohort comprised 71 patients evaluated by PET-CT and subsequently analyzed by endoscopy; 69% were male with a mean age of 65.77 ± 11.2. The rate of incidental colon lesions found by PET-CT was 1.73%, with 52 incidental colonic uptakes reported in 50 patients. The location of the uptake was the rectum (19.23%), sigmoid colon (34.62%), descending colon (13.46%), transverse colon (1.9%), ascending colon (19.23%), cecum (9.62%) and ileocolic anastomosis (1.92%). Thirty-five pathological colonoscopies (71.15%) were identified: the findings included five neoplasms (13.51%), two inflammatory lesions (5.4%) and 30 adenomatous polyps (81.1%). Significant differences were found between neoplastic SUVmax (11.7 g/ml; p = 0.03) and polyps (9.26 g/ml; p = 0.04) in relation to inflammatory lesions and normal endoscopies (6.05 g/ml). There were no differences in terms of the size of the polyps, nor the presence or absence of high grade dysplasia (p = 0.12 and 0.33). Both PET-CT and endoscopy proved consistent for locating lesions (k 0.90; CI 95% 0.86-0.93). Conclusion: there is a good correlation between the findings identified by PET-CT and the endoscopic study. In our study, a SUVmax > 11 g/ml suggests a malignant pathology, which aids the prioritization of an endoscopic study.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Weston BR, Iyer RB, Qiao W, et al. Ability of integrated positron emission and computed tomography to detect significant colonic pathology: the experience of a tertiary cancer center. Cancer. 2010;116:1454-61. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24885. PMID: 20143447
2. Lin M, Koo JH, Abi-Hanna D. Management of patients following detection of unsuspected colon lesions by PET imaging. ClinGastroenterolHepatol. 2011; 9: 1025-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.06.028. PMID 21723237
3. Putora RM, Müller J, Borovicka J, et al. Relevance of incidental colorectal FDG-PET-CT-enhanced lesions. Onkologie. 2013;36:200-4.DOI: 10.1159/000350302. PMID: 23548969
4. Cook GJ, Fogelman I, Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. SeminNucl Med. 1996;26:308-14.PMID: 8916319
5. Prabhakar HB, Sahani DV, Fischman AJ, et al. Bowel hot spots at PET-CT. Radiographics. 2007; 27(1):145-59. PMID: 17235004
6. Treglia G, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, et al. Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2011;14:174-180.DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02588.x. PMID: 21689289
7. Beatty JS, Williams HT, Aldrige BA, et al. Incidental PET/CT findings in the cancer patient: how should they be managed? Surgery. 2009;146:274-81.DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.024. PMID: 19628085
8. Van HoeijFB, Keijsers RG, Loffeld BC, et al. Incidental colonic focal FDG uptake on PET/CT: can the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) guide us in the timing of colonoscopy? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(1):66-71.DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2887-3. PMID: 25139518
9. Steenkamp DW, McDonnell ME, Meibom S. Metformin may be associated with false-negative cancer detection in the gastrointestinal tract on PET/CT. EndocrPract. 2014;20(10):1079-83. DOI: 10.4158/EP14127.RA. PMID: 25100379
10. Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480-508.DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047787. PMID: 18287273
11. Jamar F, Buscombe J, Chiti A, et al. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infections.JNucl Med. 2013;54(4):647-58.DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112524. PMID: 23359660
12. Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M, et al. Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET-TC. AJR Amb J Roentgenol. 2005;185:495-500.PMID: 16037527
13. Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR, et al. Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2002;224:783-7.PMID: 12202714
14. Drenth JP, Nagengast FM, Oyen WJ. Evaluation of (pre-)malignant colonic abnormalities: endoscopic validation of FDG-PET findings. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1766-9.PMID: 11734913
15. Peng J, He Y, Xu J, et al. Detection of incidental colorectal tumours with 18F-labelled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans: results of a prospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:e374-8.DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02727.x. PMID: 21831098
16. Farquaharson AL, Chopra A, Ford A, et al. Incidental focal colonic lesions found on (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan: further support for a national guideline on definitive management. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:.e56-63.DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02760.x. PMID: 21831171
17. Kei PL, Vikram R, Yeung HW, et al. Incidental finding of focal FDG uptake in the bowel during PET-CT: CT features and correlation with histopathologic results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(5):W401-6.DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3703. PMID: 20410385
18. Luboldt W, Volker T, Wiedemann B, et al. Detection of relevant colonic neoplasms with PET/CT: promising accuracy with minimal CT dose and a standardized PET cut-off. EurRadiol. 2010;20(9):2274-85.DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1772-0. PMID: 20503051
Related articles

Letter

Vaginal lesion as first manifestation of colorectal disease

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9270/2022

Letter

An uncommon colonic polyp

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9160/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Intestinal obstruction due to bariolith impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9084/2022

Letter

Anorectal malignant melanoma, a diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9068/2022

Letter

Lead ingestion, medical emergency and action plan

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9048/2022

Letter

Endoscopic findings of radiation ileitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9036/2022

Letter

Endoscopic imaging of pneumatosis intestinalis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8972/2022

Editorial

Colonoscopy — When quality matters

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8942/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Colonic Kaposi’s sarcoma as the first clinical manifestation of undiagnosed HIV

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8717/2022

Letter

Gastrointestinal lymphoma, a rare endoscopic lesion

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8555/2021

Letter

Cecal MALT lymphoma: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8526/2021

Letter

Surprises in cecal intubation: foreign bodies in the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8155/2021

Review

Inflammatory bowel disease and solid organ transplantation

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7361/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Phlebosclerotic colitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain and hematochezia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7358/2020

Review

New non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7233/2020

Letter

Medullary colorectal carcinoma. Do we really know it?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6728/2019

Case Report

Primary colon mantle lymphoma: a misleading macroscopic appearance!

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6405/2019

Letter

The rectosigmoid junction: are limits important?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5983/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

Colorectal penetration by two intrauterine devices

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5974/2018

Editorial

Colorectal cancer screening and survival

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Letter

Bacterial endogenous endophthalmitis after colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5658/2018

Review

Quality indicators in colonoscopy. The colonoscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5408/2017

Letter to the Editor

A rare complication after colonoscopy: a splenic rupture

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5362/2017

Letter to the Editor

Acute appendicitis after a colonic endoscopic submucosal resection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5307/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

Contribution of the virtual colonoscopy in a case of intestinal intussusception

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5261/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

A bull horn fragment found on colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5020/2017

Editorial

Issue pending: minimizing anxiety before colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4756/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Intrauterine device in the rectal cavity

Letter to the Editor

Liver metastasis from colorectal cancer 12 years after liver transplantation

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4507/2016

Letter to the Editor

Primary chancre in the rectum: an underdiagnosed cause of rectal ulcer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4457/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis

Review

Serrated lesions and serrated polyposis syndrome

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4065/2015

Letter to the Editor

Endobronchial metastases of colorectal cancer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4080/2015

Letter to the Editor

Splenic rupture after colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3714/2015

Citation tools
Garrido Durán C, Payeras Capó M, García Caparrós C, Giménez García M, Daumal Domenech J. Clinical-endoscopic relevance of incidental colorectal lesions detected by PET-CT. 4719/2016


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 244 visits.
This article has been downloaded 207 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 09/11/2016

Accepted: 13/01/2018

Online First: 19/03/2018

Published: 02/07/2018

Article revision time: 423 days

Article Online First time: 495 days

Article editing time: 600 days


Share
This article has been rated by 4 readers.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology