Año 2019 / Volumen 111 / Número 9
Original
Endoscopic biliary drainage in unresectable biliary obstruction: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guidance in a cohort study

683-689

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6225/2019

Manuel Puga, Natàlia Pallarès, Julio Velásquez-Rodríguez, Albert García-Sumalla, Claudia F. Consiglieri, Juli Busquets, Berta Laquente, Mariona Calvo, Joan Fabregat, José Castellote, Joan B. Gornals,

Resumen
Background and study aims: the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has increased in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and there are some concerns. The main aim of the study was to determine the role of EUS-BD in a palliative case cohort. The secondary aim was to compare the efficacy, safety and survival of EUS-BD and ERCP procedures. Patients and methods: this was an observational study at a single tertiary institution, with a consecutive inclusion from January 2015 to December 2016. The inclusion criteria were unresectable tumors of the biliopancreatic region with an indication of BD. Statistical comparison analysis was performed between the ERCP and EUS-BD groups. The incidence between groups was compared using the Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. The log rank test was used to compare the risk of death. Results: fifty-two cases with an indication of palliative BD were included in the study. Transpapillary drainage via ERCP was possible in 44 procedures and EUS-BD was required in eight cases; 15.4% of the cohort and seven using lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS). The technical and clinical success of global endoscopic BD was 100% and 88.5% (ERCP: 84.6% and 78.9%; EUS-BD: 100% and 62.5%, respectively). Pancreatitis was the most frequent adverse event (AE) in the ERCP group (9.62%) and bleeding in the EUS-BD (25%). There were fatal AEs in ERCP (1.9%) and EUS-BD (25%) cases. Patient survival was higher with ERCP transpapillary stents compared to EUS-guided stents, which was statistically significant (p = 0.007). Conclusions: the requirement of EUS-BD in palliative biliopancreatic pathology is not marginal. EUS-BD is associated with a lower survival rate and a higher rate of fatal AE, which argues against its use as a first choice procedure.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Kedia P, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic guided biliary drainage: How can we achieve efficient biliary drainage? Clin Endosc 2013; 46: 543-551.
2. Seufferlein T, Bachet JB, Van Cutsem E et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2012; 23 Suppl 7:vii33.
3. Valle JW, Borbath I, Khan SA et al. Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:v28.
4. Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-930.
5. Peng C, Nietert PJ, Cotton PB et al. Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) quality network. BMC Gastroenterol 2013;13:147.
6. Williams EJ, Ogollah R, Thomas P et al. What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 674-683.
7. Holt BA, Hawes R, Hasan M et al. Biliary drainage: role of EUS guidance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83:160-165.
8. Mora Soler AM, Álvarez Delgado A, Piñero Pérez MC et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy after a failed or impossible ERCP.Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018;110:299-305.
9. Kawakubo K, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy vs. transpapillary stenting for distal biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 2016; 48: 164-169.
10. Jain D, Shah M, Patel U et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided choledocho-enterostomy by using lumen apposing metal stent in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a literature review. Digestion. 2018; 98: 1-10.
11. Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 2014; 270:248.
12. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71: 446-454.
13. Kaul V, Adler DG, Conway JD, et al. ASGE report on emerging technology: Interventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1-4.
14. Tonozuka R, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage is infrequently used even in high-volume centers of interventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 206-207.
15. Nakai Y, Isayama H, Yamamoto N et al. Indications for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided biliary intervention: does EUS always come after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Dig Endosc. 2017; 29: 218-225.
16. Consiglieri CF, Gornals JB, Albines G. EUS-guided methylene blue cholangiopancreatography for benign biliopancreatic diseases after failed ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84: 152-157.
17. Wang k, Zhu J, Xing L et al. Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83: 1218-1227.
18. Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61: 684-703.
19. Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Lisotti A et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based-- a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 8424-8448.
20. Gornals JB, Esteban JM, Guarner-Argente C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Can they be successfully combined? Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 39: 627-642.
21. Gornals JB, Consiglieri CF, Bergamino MA. Double pigtail for preventing ascending cholangitis after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent. Dig Endosc. 2016; 28: 100.
22. Baniya R, Upadhaya S, Madala S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2017;10:67-74.
23. Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E et al. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60: 557-565.
Artículos relacionados

Carta

Hematoma post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9670/2023

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Colangiopatía post-COVID: hallazgos ultrasonográficos y de CPRE

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9218/2022

Carta

Angiosarcoma de aorta diagnosticado mediante ecoendoscopia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8879/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Linfoma pancreático durante el embarazo

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8811/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

When needles are not enough, forceps delivers!

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8697/2022

Carta

Mesotelioma decidual maligno, ¿hasta dónde llegamos con USE?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8352/2021

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Cholangiohydatidosis: an uncommon cause of acute cholangitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7063/2020

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the biliary tract: a lesion of the bile duct lumen

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6186/2019

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Cumbersome removal of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5962/2018

Carta

A veces las cosas son lo que parecen

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5911/2018

Carta

Obstructive jaundice of a parasitic etiology

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5827/2018

Carta al Editor

EUS-guided ethanol ablation therapy for gastric stromal tumors

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5361/2017

Carta al Editor

Neoplasia neuroendocrina rectal

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4836/2017

Revisión

Endoscopic ampullectomy: a technical review

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.3867/2015

Caso Clínico

Pelvic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor mimicking a rectal cancer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3777/2015

Instrucciones para citar
Puga M, Pallarès N, Velásquez-Rodríguez J, García-Sumalla A, Consiglieri C, Busquets J, et all. Endoscopic biliary drainage in unresectable biliary obstruction: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guidance in a cohort study. 6225/2019


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 1021 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 243 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 10/02/2019

Aceptado: 02/04/2019

Prepublicado: 23/07/2019

Publicado: 05/09/2019

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 49 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 163 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 207 días


Compartir
Este artículo ha sido valorado por 6 lectores .
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas