Año 2019 / Volumen 111 / Número 2
Original
Cystic tumors of the pancreas. An update of the surgical experience in a single institution

87-93

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5798/2018

Luis Hurtado-Pardo, Javier A. Cienfuegos, Javier Antoñanzas, Alberto Benito, Pablo Panadero, Joseba Salguero, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga, Gabriel Zozaya, Víctor Valentí, Fernando Pardo, Fernando Rotellar, José Luis Hernández Lizoáin,

Resumen
Background: the aim of the present study was to analyze the clinicopathological features of patients undergoing pancreatic surgical resections due to cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Material and methods: demographic data, form of presentation, radiologic images and location of the tumors within the pancreas were analyzed. Data was also collected on the type of surgery (open/laparoscopic), postoperative complications and their severity and oncologic outcomes. Results: eighty-two pancreatic resections were performed. The mean age of patients was 57 years and 49 (59%) were female. Forty-one tumors (50%) were incidental and the most frequent symptoms in the group of symptomatic patients were abdominal pain (63.4%) and weight loss (36.5%). Thirty-two tumors (39%) were located in the tail of the pancreas, 25 (30.5%) in the head and 20 (24.4%) in the body. Thirty-nine (47.5%) distal pancreatectomies, 16 central, ten duodenal pancreatectomies and one enucleation were performed; 40 (48.5%) were carried out laparoscopically. Mean hospital stay was ten days and eight patients (7%) experienced severe complications, one was a pancreatic fistula. Sixty-six tumors (80.5%) were recorded as non-invasive and 16 (19.5%) as invasive: seven intraductal mucinous papillary tumors, one cystic mucinous tumor, four solid pseudopapillary tumors and four cystic neuroendocrine tumors. There was a median follow-up of 64 months; disease-free survival at five and ten years was 97.4% in the patients with non-invasive tumors and 84.6% and 70.5% in the invasive tumors group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: fifty percent of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are incidental. Two phenotypes exist, invasive and non-invasive.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Elta GH, Enestvedt BK, Sauer BG. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cysts. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018;113:464–479.
2. European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas. European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gut 2018;67:789–804.
3. Scheiman JM, Hwang JH, Moayyedi P. American gastroenterological association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015;148:824–48.e22.
4. Moris M, Wallace MB. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystadenomas: current status and recommendations. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2017;109:358–367.
5. Correa-Gallego C, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP, Wargo JA, Warshaw AL, Fernández-Del Castillo C. Incidental pancreatic cysts: do we really know what we are watching? Pancreatology 2010;10:144–50.
6. Valsangkar NP, Morales-Oyarvide V, Thayer SP, et al. 851 resected cystic tumors of the pancreas: a 33-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery 2012;152:S4-12.
7. Lennon AM, Manos LL, Hruban RH, et al. Role of a multidisciplinary clinic in the management of patients with pancreatic cysts: a single-center cohort study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014;21:3668–3674.
8. Gaujoux S, Brennan MF, Gonen M, et al. Cystic lesions of the pancreas: changes in the presentation and management of 1,424 patients at a single institution over a 15-year time period. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011;212:590–593.
9. Bose D, Tamm E, Liu J, et al. Multidisciplinary management strategy for incidental cystic lesions of the pancreas. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2010;211:205–15.
10. Bouquot M, Gaujoux S, Cauchy F, et al. Pancreatectomy for pancreatic incidentaloma: What are the risks? Pancreatology 2018;18:114–121.
11. Barkin JA, Barkin JS. Pancreatic Cysts: Controversies, Advances, Diagnoses, and Therapies. Pancreas 2017;46:735–741.
12. Lariño Noia J. Latest advances in pancreatic tumours. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;39 Suppl 1:93–101.
13. Tanaka M, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Kamisawa T, et al. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2017;17:738–753.
14. Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R, et al. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015;148:819-22; quize12–3.
15. Basturk O, Hong S-M, Wood LD, et al. A Revised Classification System and Recommendations From the Baltimore Consensus Meeting for Neoplastic Precursor Lesions in the Pancreas. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015;39:1730–41.
16. Nimptsch U, Krautz C, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grützmann R. Nationwide In-hospital Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany is Higher than Anticipated. Ann. Surg. 2016;264:1082–1090.
17. Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012;16:1727–35.
18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England) 2007;370:1453–7.
19. Terris B, Fukushima N, Hruban RH. Serous neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise N, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010:296–299.
20. Zamboni G, Fukushima N, Hruban RH, Klöppel G. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010:300–303.
21. Adsay N V, Fukushima N, Furukawa T, et al. Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise N D, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010:304–313.
22. Klimstra DS, Arnold R, Capella C, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010:322–326.
23. Adsay V, Mino-Kenudson M, Furukawa T, et al. Pathologic Evaluation and Reporting of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas and Other Tumoral Intraepithelial Neoplasms of Pancreatobiliary Tract: Recommendations of Verona Consensus Meeting. Ann. Surg. 2016;263:162–77.
24. Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978;49:233–6.
25. Lariño-Noia J, de la Iglesia D, Iglesias-García J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound cytologic brushing vs endoscopic ultrasound - fine needle aspiration for cytological diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. A multicenter, randomized open-label trial. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2018;110:478–484.
26. Rotellar F, Pardo F, Cervera M, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy. Surgical technique. Surg.Endosc. 2006;20 Suppl 1:S245.
27. Rotellar F, Pardo F, Montiel C, et al. Totally laparoscopic roux-en-Y duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after middle pancreatectomy: A consecutive nine-case series at a single institution. Ann. Surg. 2008;247.
28. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:292–298.
29. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
30. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13.
31. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007;142:761–768.
32. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20–25.
33. Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2012;35 Suppl 1:S64-71.
34. Shi C, Adsay V, Bergsland EK, et al. Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Tumors of the Endocrine Pancreas. Available at: http://www.cap.org/ShowProperty?nodePath=/UCMCon/Contribution Folders/WebContent/pdf/cp-pancreas-endocrine-17protocol-4000.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2018.
35. Kloppel G, Rindi G, Perren A, Komminoth P, Klimstra DS. The ENETS and AJCC/UICC TNM classifications of the neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: a statement. Virchows Arch. 2010;456:595–597.
36. Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, et al. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgery 2014;156:538–547.
37. Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, Bowers KA, Hutchins RR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas 2012;41:993–1000.
38. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 2017;161:584–591.
39. Adham M, Chopin-Laly X, Lepilliez V, Gincul R, Valette PJ, Ponchon T. Pancreatic resection: drain or no drain? Surgery 2013;154:1069–1077.
40. Griffin JF, Page AJ, Samaha GJ, et al. Patients with a resected pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm have a better prognosis than patients with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: A large single institution series. Pancreatology 2017;17:490–496.
41. Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;191:802–7.
42. Antoñanzas J., Cienfuegos J.A., Hurtado-Pardo L., et al. Intraductal papillary mucinonous neoplasm(IPMN) of the pancreas: clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes following pancreatectony. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2018;In press.
43. Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, et al. TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012;104:764–777.
44. Hurtado-Pardo L, A Cienfuegos J, Ruiz-Canela M, Panadero P, Benito A, Hernández Lizoain JL. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPNETs): a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2017;109:778–787.
45. Law JK, Ahmed A, Singh VK, et al. A systematic review of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms: are these rare lesions? Pancreas 2014;43:331–7.
46. Paiella S, Marchegiani G, Miotto M, et al. Are Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors an Indolent Entity Results from a Single-Center Surgical Series. Neuroendocrinology 2018;106:234–241.
47. Cho CS, Russ AJ, Loeffler AG, et al. Preoperative classification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: the clinical significance of diagnostic inaccuracy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013;20:3112–9.
Artículos relacionados

Editorial

Menos endoscopistas deberían hacer más CPRE

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9507/2022

Instrucciones para citar
Hurtado-Pardo L, A. Cienfuegos J, Antoñanzas J, Benito A, Panadero P, Salguero J, et all. Cystic tumors of the pancreas. An update of the surgical experience in a single institution. 5798/2018


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 655 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 274 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 27/06/2018

Aceptado: 08/09/2018

Prepublicado: 08/11/2018

Publicado: 01/02/2019

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 68 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 134 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 219 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas