Year 2020 / Volume 112 / Number 6
Original
Hemodynamic changes after endoscopic variceal ligation: a cohort study

456-461

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6656/2019

Nerea Gonzalo Bada, José Manuel Suárez Parga, Teresa Hernández Cabrero, Dolores Ponce Dorrego, Yolanda Zarauza Soto, Marta Abadía Barnó, Antonio Olveira Martín, Joan Novo Torres, Ricardo Rodríguez Díaz, Lucia Fernández Rodríguez, Pedro Mora Sanz, Consuelo Froilán Torres,

Abstract
Background: there is controversy about the need to maintain vasoconstrictor treatment after adequate haemostasis is achieved through endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in bleeding esophageal varices (BEV). Measuring a “before and after urgent-EBL” hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in acute variceal hemorrhage is very difficult. Thus, the goal of this study was to determine hemodynamic variations after an EBL session. A “before” HVPG (PRE) was performed and another one 24 hours “after-ligation” (POST), in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic band ligation as BEV prophylaxis. Patients and methods: this was a single-center, cohort, prospective study. Patients followed a program of repeated sessions of EBL until eradication of their varices and underwent a basal hepatic venous pressure gradient (PRE HVPG), without changing their usual treatment with beta-blockers. Subsequently, an endoscopic ligation session was performed, following the clinical practices guidelines. A second pressure measurement (POST HVPG) was taken 24 hours after the endoscopic treatment. Results: 30 patients were included. PRE and POST HVPG median results were 16.5 mmHg (14-20) and 19.5 mmHg (17-21), respectively, with a significant increase after the procedure (p < 0.001). Percentage variations in portal pressure, based on the baseline gradient values (12, 16 and 20 mmHg), were higher for patients with a lower basal HVPG versus a higher HVPG for any of the categories compared (p = 0.087, p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively). In our series, 36.7 % of patients showed a ≥ 20 % gradient increase after ligation. Conclusion: endoscopic band ligation causes an increase in portal pressure, at least for a transitional period, determined by the hepatic venous pressure gradient.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1. Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. AASLD Practice Guidelines: Portal Hypertensive Bleeding in Cirrhosis: Risk Stratification, Diagnosis, and Management. Hepatology. 2017;65(1):310-335. doi:10.1002/hep.28906
2. Franchis R De. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63(3):743-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.001.
3. Berzigotti A. Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography. J Hepatol. 2017;67(2):399-411. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.003
4. Lo G-H. Do We Need Vasoconstrictors Up to 5 Days After Successful Hemostasis by Ligation of Bleeding Varices? Hepatology. 2017;66(3):1009-1010. doi:10.1002/hep.29295
5. Azam Z, Hamid S, Jafri W, et al. Short course adjuvant terlipressin in acute variceal bleeding: A randomized double blind dummy controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2012;56(4):819-824. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.11.019
6. Kumar A, Jha SK, Mittal VV, et al. Addition of Somatostatin After Successful Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Does not Prevent Early Rebleeding in Comparison to Placebo: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(3):204-212. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2015.06.001
7. Lo GH. The use of vasoconstrictors in acute variceal bleeding: How long is enough? Clin Endosc. 2019;52(1):36-39. doi:10.5946/ce.2018.084
8. Lo GH, Perng DS, Chang CY, et al. Controlled trial of ligation plus vasoconstrictor versus proton pump inhibitor in the control of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28(4):684-689. doi:10.1111/jgh.12107
9. Cavit Ozdogan O. Measurement of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Patients With Active Variceal Bleeding. Hepatology. 2005;41(2):406-407. doi:10.1002/hep.20546
10. Abraldes JG, Sarlieve P, Tandon P. Measurement of portal pressure. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;18(4):779-792. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2014.07.002
11. Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S. The Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient: Anything Worth Doing Should Be Done Right. Hepatology. 2004;39(2):280-282.
12. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, et al. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46(3):922-938. doi:10.1002/hep.21907
13. Franchis R De. Definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. A consensus Development Workshop, Baveno, Lake Maggiore, Italy 1990. J Hepatol. 1992;15:256-261.
14. Lo GH, Liang HL, Lai KH, et al. The impact of endoscopic variceal ligation on the pressure of the portal venous system. J Hepatol. 1996;24(1):74-80. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(96)80189-9
15. Avgerinos A, Armonis A, Stefanidis G, et al. Sustained rise of portal pressure after sclerotherapy, but not band ligation, in acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2004;39(6):1623-1630. doi:10.1002/hep.20236
16. Bellis L, Castellacci R, Montagnese F, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient determination in patients with hepatitis C virus-related and alcoholic cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15(10):1085-1089. doi:10.1097/01.meg.0000085475.12407.87
17. Sato M. Effects of endoscopic variceal ligation on systemic and splachnic hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis. Kurume Med J. 1997;44:191-199.
18. Li ZQ, LingHu EQ, Hu M, et al . Esophageal variceal pressure influence on the effect of ligation. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(13):3888-3892. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3888
19. Villanueva C, Aracil C, Colomo A, et al. Acute Hemodynamic Response to β-Blockers and Prediction of Long-term Outcome in Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(1):119-128. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.03.048
20. Villanueva C, Graupera I, Aracil C, et al. A Randomized Trial to Assess Whether Portal Pressure Guided Therapy to Prevent Variceal Rebleeding Improves Survival in Cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2017;65(5): 1693-1707. doi:10.1002/hep.29056/suppinfo
Related articles

Editorial

Treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis patients

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9800/2023

Letter

Tolvaptan in portal hypertension: real life experience

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9145/2022

Letter

Hemoperitoneum due to rupture of intra-abdominal varices

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8937/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Traumatic high flow arterioportal fistula. Correction by a covered stent

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8724/2022

Letter

Stomal varices: an unusual cause of bleeding in liver cirrhosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6470/2019

Letter to the Editor

Idiopathic portal hypertension with regard to thiopurine treatment

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5256/2017

Letter to the Editor

POEMS syndrome and idiopathic portal hypertension: a possible association

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4623/2016

Citation tools
Gonzalo Bada N, Suárez Parga J, Hernández Cabrero T, Ponce Dorrego D, Zarauza Soto Y, Abadía Barnó M, et all. Hemodynamic changes after endoscopic variceal ligation: a cohort study. 6656/2019


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1227 visits.
This article has been downloaded 204 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 02/10/2019

Accepted: 24/11/2019

Online First: 26/05/2020

Published: 08/06/2020

Article revision time: 41 days

Article Online First time: 237 days

Article editing time: 250 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology