Año 2016 / Volumen 108 / Número 7
Original
Tendencies and outcomes in endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies among people with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain, 2003-2013

386-393

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4276/2016

Jose de Miguel-Yanes, Manuel Méndez-Bailón, Rodrigo Jiménez-García, Cecilia González-Asanza, Valentín Hernández-Barrera, Nuria Muñoz-Rivas, Ana López-de-Andrés,

Resumen
We aimed to compare incidence and outcomes for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies in people with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Spain (2003-2013). We collected all cases of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies using national hospital discharge data and evaluated annual incident rates stratified by T2DM status. We analyzed trends over time for in-hospital mortality (IHM) as the primary outcome and a composite of IHM or procedure-related complications (key secondary outcome). In multivariate analyses, we tested T2DM as an independent factor of IHM and IHM or complications. We identified 126,885 endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies (23,002 [18.1%] in T2DM people). Crude incidence rates of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies were > 3-fold higher in people with vs without T2DM (85.5/105 vs 26.9/105 population, respectively). Annual incidence rates of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies showed 11-year relative increments of 77.5% (from 60.0 to 106.5/105) in T2DM, and 53.7% (from 21.6 to 33.2/105) in non-T2DM people (p < 0.001). We found no significant changes in mortality trends over time for the populations with or without T2DM (p = 0.15 and p = 0.21, respectively). Rates of procedural pancreatitis decreased in people without T2DM (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, older age, higher comorbidity and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy during urgent admission were associated with a higher IHM. T2DM was associated with a lower IHM after an endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (OR = 0.82 [0.74-0.92]). Time trend multivariate analyses 2003-2013 showed significant reductions in IHM over time only in people with T2DM (OR = 0.97 [0.94-1.00]). Further studies are needed to confirm a lower IHM for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies in people with T2DM.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Ikeda S, Tanaka M, Matsumoto S, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: Long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow-up. Endoscopy 1988; 20:13-7.
2. Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP, et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:228-32.
3. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:909-18.
4. Fölsch UR, Nitsche R, Lüdtke R, et al. Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. The German Study Group on Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:237-42.
5. Hammarstrom LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H. Endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ: long-term outcome and factors. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31:294-301.
6. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones. Lancet 1997; 349:1124-29.
7. Kogure H, Tsujino T, Isayama H, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49:121-28.
8. Doi S, Yasuda I, Mukai T, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis. J Gastroenterol 2013; 48:1090-6.
9. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1047-53.
10. Soriguer F, Goday A, Bosch-Comas A, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the Di@bet.es Study. Diabetologia 2012; 55:88-93.
11. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo: Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, Hospitales del INSALUD. Available at http://www.ingesa.msc.es/estadEstudios/documPublica/CMBD-2001.htm (accessed December 09, 2014).
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm (accessed December 04, 2014).
13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373-83.
14. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:613-19.
15. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE): Population estimates. Available at http://www.ine.es (accessed 01 December 2014).Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad.
16. http://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/ (accessed 28 November 2014).
17. Pagliarulo M, Fornari F, Fraquelli M. Gallstone disease and related risk factors in a large cohort of diabetic patients. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36:130-34.
18. Sandzén B, Haapamäki MM, Nilsson E, et al. Treatment of common bile duct stones in Sweden 1989-2006: an observational nationwide study of a paradigm shift. World J Surg 2012; 36:2146-53.
19. Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:1291-99.
20. Aiura K, Kitagawa Y. Current status of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18:339-45.
21. Binmoeller KF, Harris AG, Dumas R, et al. Does the somatostatin analogue octreotide protect against ERCP induced pancreatitis? Gut 1992; 33:1129-33.
22. Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 12:CD003327.
23. Yang Y, Salam ZH, Ong BC, et al. Respiratory dysfunction in patients with sepsis: protective effect of diabetes mellitus. Am J Crit Care 2011; 20:e41-47.
24. Koh GCKW, Peacock SJ, van der Poll T, et al. The impact of diabetes on the pathogenesis of sepsis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31:379-88.
25. Gruberg L, Weissman NJ, Waksman R, F et al. The impact of obesity on the short-term and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:578-84.
26. Leong A, Dasgupta K, Bernatsky S, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Validation Studies on a Diabetes Case Definition from Health Administrative Records. PLoS One 2013; 8: e75256.
27. Ribera A, Marsal JR, Ferreira-González I, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality with coronary bypass surgery using hospital discharge data: comparison with a prospective observational study. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008; 61:843-52.
Artículos relacionados

Carta

Complicaciones vasculares tras paracentesis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6914/2020

Revisión

Meckel’s diverticulum: clinical features, diagnosis and management

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5628/2018

Editorial

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: a time to step forward

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5054/2017

Original

Utilidad del balón intragástrico previo a cirugía bariátrica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4624/2016

Carta al Editor

Glucogenosis hepática diabética: un nuevo reto diagnóstico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4605/2016

Original

Estudio multicéntrico de seguridad en endoscopia bariátrica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4499/2016

Carta al Editor

Hematoma gástrico intramural en el contexto de una pancreatitis aguda

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4494/2016

Caso Clínico

Glycogenic hepatopathy in young adults: a case series

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.3934/2015

Instrucciones para citar
de Miguel-Yanes J, Méndez-Bailón M, Jiménez-García R, González-Asanza C, Hernández-Barrera V, Muñoz-Rivas N, et all. Tendencies and outcomes in endoscopic biliary sphincterotomies among people with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain, 2003-2013. 4276/2016


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 597 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 47 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 18/02/2016

Aceptado: 11/04/2016

Prepublicado: 25/04/2016

Publicado: 11/07/2016

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 49 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 67 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 144 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas