Año 2018 / Volumen 110 / Número 10
Original
The impact of a percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter in situ until the time of cholecystectomy on the development of recurrent acute cholecystitis: a historical cohort study

629-633

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5644/2018

Mustafa Hasbahceci, Merve Busra Cengiz, Fatma Umit Malya, Enver Kunduz, Naim Memmi,

Resumen
Background: the optimal duration of percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis is unknown. Methods: this study was a retrospective analysis of patients (age ≥ 18 years) who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy due to acute calculous cholecystitis. Patients were grouped according to treatment modality: percutaneous cholecystostomy as a definitive treatment (group 1), subsequent surgical treatment after the removal of the catheter (group 2) and those remaining in situ (group 3). The development of gallstone-related complications was the main outcome. Results: there were 24 females (43.6%) and 31 males (56.4%) included in the study with a mean age of 64.8 ± 15.9 years. There were 16 (29.1%), 19 (34.5%) and 20 (36.4%) patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The catheter withdrawal time for group 1 and group 2 was 18.2 ± 6.9 and 20.7 ± 13.4 days, respectively. Surgical treatment was performed after a mean of 85.4 ± 93.5 days following catheter removal in group 2 and a mean of 64 ± 32.5 days while the PC tube was in place in group 3. There were one (6.3%) and two cases of a recurrence (10.5%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Two patients developed choledocholithiasis (10%) in group 3. Conclusion: maintaining percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes in place until the time of surgery in surgically fit patients may help to prevent a recurrence after acute calculous cholecystitis.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Wang CH, Wu CY, Yang JC, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis after Successful Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Treatment and the Risk Factors for Recurrence: A Decade Experience at a Single Center. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0148017.
2. Viste A, Jensen D, Angelsen JH, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis; a retrospective analysis of a large series of 104 patients. BMC Surg. 2015; 15: 17.
3. Mizrahi I, Mazeh H, Yuval JB, et al. Perioperative outcomes of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis with and without percutaneous cholecystostomy. Surgery. 2015; 158: 728-35.
4. Hasbahçeci M, Alimoğlu O, Başak F, et al. Review of clinical experience with acute cholecystitis on the development of subsequent gallstone-related complications. Turk J Med Sci. 2014; 44: 883-8.
5. Popowicz A, Lundell L, Gerber P, et al. Cholecystostomy as Bridge to Surgery and as Definitive Treatment or Acute Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016; 2016: 3672416.
6. Hasbahceci M, Uludag M, Erol C, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single, non-teaching hospital: an analysis of 1557 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012; 22: 527-32.
7. Yeo CS, Tay VW, Low JK, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016; 23: 65-73.
8. Bickel A, Hoffman RS, Loberant N, et al. Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy affects conversion rate of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30: 1028-33.
9. McGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Barre K, et al. Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2012; 99: 1254-61.
10. Jang WS, Lim JU, Joo KR, et al. Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 2359-64.
11. Hsieh YC, Chen CK, Su CW, et al. Outcome after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 1860-8.
12. Macchini D, Degrate L, Oldani M, et al. Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal: systematic review. Minerva Chir. 2016; 71: 415-426.
13. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 20: 35-46.
14. Morse BC, Smith JB, Lawdahl RB, et al. Management of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: contemporary role for cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2010; 76: 708-12.
15. Venara A, Carretier V, Lebigot J, et al. Technique and indications of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of cholecystitis in 2014. J Visc Surg. 2014; 151: 435-9.
16. Sugiyama M, Tokuhara M, Atomi Y. Is percutaneous cholecystostomy the optimal treatment for acute cholecystitis in the very elderly? World J Surg. 1988; 22: 459-63.
Artículos relacionados

Carta

Recurrencia del schwannoma gástrico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9480/2023

Carta

Acute cholecystitis treated by direct visualization endoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9432/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Mirizzi syndrome: when the gallbladder meets bile ducts

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5846/2018

Carta

Perforated emphysematous cholecystitis and Streptococcus bovis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5826/2018

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Hemobilia por pseudoaneurisma de la arteria cística en ecografía

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4936/2017

Carta al Editor

Una causa infrecuente de dolor abdominal en el niño

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4168/2015

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Porcelain gallbladder

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Síndrome de Bouveret

Instrucciones para citar
Hasbahceci M, Cengiz M, Malya F, Kunduz E, Memmi N. The impact of a percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter in situ until the time of cholecystectomy on the development of recurrent acute cholecystitis: a historical cohort study. 5644/2018


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 556 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 165 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 10/04/2018

Aceptado: 17/05/2018

Prepublicado: 23/07/2018

Publicado: 01/10/2018

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 31 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 104 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 174 días


Compartir
Este artículo ha sido valorado por 3 lectores .
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas