Año 2022 / Volumen 114 / Número 7
Original
Evaluation of online content of proctological disorders in the Portuguese language

400-404

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8333/2021

Sofia Silva Mendes, Raquel Oliveira, Raquel Gonçalves, Ana Célia Caetano,

Resumen
Introduction: health literacy has an increasing relevance as the disseminated access to online contents may impact on community health. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the online content of benign proctological disorders. Methods: the platforms Google© and YouTube™ were searched using the keywords hemorrhoidal disease, anal fistula, anal fissure, anal pruritus and fecal incontinence. Each page was analyzed for: interactivity, credibility, readability and content adequacy. For each video, the content, reactions and comments of the users were analyzed. Three validated scales were applied: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG); Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices (DISCERN). Results: a total of 127 webpages and 113 videos were evaluated. Forty webpages (31.50 %) included images and ten (37.04 %) had informative videos. The SMOG scale had an average value of 9.91 ± 0.94, which estimates the need for ten years of schooling for comprehension and 64 webpages (52.07 %) presented a reading level higher than the recommended B1. The mean SAM score was 39.46 ± 11.2 % and the DISCERN scale averaged 40.33 ± 5.69, corresponding to a reasonable content. Only 20 pages (15.75 %) included interactivity tools and 44 (34.64 %) contained bibliographic references. The videos posted by patients (n = 67, 59.2 %) had the highest number of views and positive comments whereas videos from health professionals (n = 21; 18.75 %) had the highest proportion of requests for additional information. Discussion: online content regarding benign proctological disorders is globally inappropriate for the health literacy level of the Portuguese population, both at the written and reading levels.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Moretti, F. A., Oliveira, V. E. D., & Silva, E. M. K. D. (2012). Access to health information on the internet: a public health issue? Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 58(6), 650-658. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302012000600008.
2. Meppelink, C. S., van Weert, J. C., Brosius, A., & Smit, E. G. (2017). Dutch health websites and their ability to inform people with low health literacy. Patient education and counseling, 100(11), 2012-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.012.
3. Serrão, C., Veiga, S., & Vieira, I. (2015). Literacia em saúde: Resultados obtidos a partir de uma amostra de pessoas idosas portuguesas. Revista Portuguesa de Enfermagem de Saúde Mental, (SPE2), 33-38. Available from: http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1647-21602015000100006&lng=pt. Accessed 7 September 2020.
4. Rita, A., Amaral, O., & Escoval, A. (2016). Literacia em saúde, dos dados à ação: tradução, validação e aplicação do European Health Literacy Survey em Portugal, 4(3), 259–275. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsp.2016.07.002.
5. Costa, A., Saboga-Nunes, L., & Costa, L. (2016). Avaliação do nível de literacia para a saúde numa amostra portuguesa. Available at http://repositorio.insa. pt/bitstream/10400.18/4111/1/Boletim_Epidemiologico_Observacoes_N17_2016_artigo9.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2020.
6. Malafaia, G., da Silva Castro, A. L., & de Lima Rodrigues, A. S. (2011). A qualidade das informações sobre doenças disponíveis em websites brasileiros: uma revisão. Arquivos Brasileiros de Ciências da Saúde, 36(2). doi: 10.7322/abcs.v36i2.63.
7. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368. DOI:10.1177/1463499606066892
8. Tournu G, Abramowitz L, Couffignal C, Juguet F, Sénéjoux A. Prevalence of anal symptoms in general practice: a prospective study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0905-z.
9. Martins, I. Pereira, J. (2010, 01). SUPURAÇÕES PERIANAIS ABCESSOS E FÍSTULAS ANAIS. Revista Portuguesa de Coloproctologia. Available at https://www.spcoloprocto.org/uploads/recomendac807_o771_es_supurac807_o771_es_perianais.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2020.
10. Deus, J. R., Pereira, A., & Silva, P. (2010). Doença hemorroidária. Revista Portuguesa de Coloproctologia, 28-31. Available at https://www.spcoloprocto.org/uploads/recomendacoes_doenca_hemorroidaria.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2020.
11. Laurent MR, Vickers TJ. Seeking Health Information Online: Does Wikipedia Matter? J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2009;16(4):471–9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3059.
12. Da Europa, C. (2001). Quadro europeu comum de referência para as línguas. Aprendizagem, ensino, avaliação. Porto: Edições ASA. Available at https://area.dge.mec.pt/gramatica/Quadro_Europeu_total.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2020.
13. Dahl, S., Eagle, L., & Souza, V. (2017). Olá! Estás a ouvir-me? Estudo exploratório da informação de saúde e da sua compreensão, com base em fontes da Internet em português e inglês. Revista de Gestão dos Países de Língua Portuguesa, 16(3), 44-58. Available at http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1645-44642017000300005. Accessed 7 September 2020.
14. Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Root, J. H. (1996). Teaching patients with low literacy skills (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott. Available at https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthliteracy/resources/teaching-patients-with-low-literacy-skills/. Accessed 7 September 2020.
15. Charnock, D. (1998). The DISCERN handbook. Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. Radcliffe: University of Oxford and The British Library. Available at http://www.discern.org.uk/discern.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2020.
16. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web. Med J Aust. 2002;176(May). doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04509.x.
17. Marshall, J. H., Baker, D. M., Lee, M. J., Jones, G. L., Lobo, A. J., & Brown, S. R. (2018). The assessment of online health videos for surgery in Crohn's disease. Colorectal Disease, 20(7), 606-613. doi: 10.1111/codi.14045.
18. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 15(2), 155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
19. Pordata (Internet). População residente com 15 e mais anos por nível de escolaridade completo mais elevado (%). PORDATA - Base de Dados Portugal. Available from: https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Popula%c3%a7%c3%a3o+residente+com+15+a+64+anos+e+65+e+mais+anos+por+n%c3%advel+de+escolaridade+completo+mais+elevado+(percentagem)-2266. Accessed 8 August 2020.
20. Tian, C., Champlin, S., Mackert, M., Lazard, A., & Agrawal, D. (2014). Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 80(2), 284-290. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034.
21. Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient education and counseling, 61(2), 173-190. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004.
22. N. Diviani, B. van den Putte, C.S. Meppelink, J.C.M. van Weert, Exploring the role of health literacy in the evaluation of online health information: insights from a mixed-methods study, Patient Educ. Couns. 99 (2016) 1017–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.007.
23. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, Zullino D. Quality of web-based information on cocaine addiction. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72:336–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.002
24. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. 2015;21(3):173-94. doi: 10.1177/1460458213512220.
Artículos relacionados
Instrucciones para citar
Silva Mendes S, Oliveira R, Gonçalves R, Caetano A. Evaluation of online content of proctological disorders in the Portuguese language. 8333/2021


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 521 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 41 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 07/09/2021

Aceptado: 11/11/2021

Prepublicado: 16/11/2021

Publicado: 07/07/2022

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 59 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 70 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 303 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas