Año 2022 / Volumen 114 / Número 8
Original
Clinical features and diagnostic approaches for abdominal tuberculosis: five-year experience from a non-tuberculosis-designated hospital in China

461-467

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8022/2021

Jin Wenting, Ma Yuyan, Shi Qingfeng, Zhang Yao, Yao Yumeng, Su Yi, Huang Yingnan, Miao Qing, Wang Qingqing, Wang Mengran, Li Bing, Luo Yu, Cai Sishi, Li Na, Bao Rong, Gao Xiaodong, Pan Jue, Hu Bijie,

Resumen
Background and purpose: abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is a common form of extrapulmonary TB but it is still a diagnostic dilemma in clinical practice. This study aimed to highlight the clinical features and diagnostic approaches for abdominal TB. Methods: seventy cases of diagnosed abdominal TB were retrospectively collected between August 1st, 2015 and June 30th, 2020. They were classified as peritoneal TB, lymph node TB, gastrointestinal TB, visceral TB or mixed TB. Results: eighteen patients were diagnosed with peritoneal TB, nine with lymph node TB, five with gastrointestinal TB, two with visceral TB and 36 with mixed TB. More than 65 % of the patients had tuberculosis of other sites except the abdomen. The median diagnosis time was 60 days. Ascites (58.6 %), abdominal distension (48.6 %), weight loss (44.3 %) and fever (42.9 %) were the most common symptoms. The overall microbiological and histological detection rates were 70.0 % and 38.6 %, respectively. The non-ascite samples yielded a higher microbiological confirmation rate (63.6 %) than the total samples (40.8 %). Diagnosis was confirmed histologically in 18 patients (69.2 %). Forty-five cases (64.3 %) were clinically diagnosed. Invasive procedures such as surgery (6/7), percutaneous biopsy (7/7) and endoscopy in lymph node TB (4/5) had high confirmation rates. Conclusions: the diagnosis of abdominal TB should be reached by a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological and pathological findings.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131
2. Chaudhary P, Kumar R, Ahirwar N, et al. A retrospective cohort study of 756 cases of abdominal tuberculosis: Two decades single centre experience. Indian J Tuberc. 2016; 63: 245-50.
3. Udgirkar S, Jain S, Pawar S, et al. Clinical profile, drug resistance pattern and treatment outcomes of abdominal tuberculosis patients in western india. Arq Gastroenterol. 2019; 56: 178-83.
4. Abu-Zidan FM, Sheek-Hussein M. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: lessons learned over 30 years: pectoral assay. World J Emerg Surg. 2019; 14: 33.
5. Uygur-Bayramicli O, Dabak G, Dabak R. A clinical dilemma: abdominal tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003; 9: 1098-101.
6. Cho JK, Choi YM, Lee SS, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of abdominal tuberculosis in southeastern Korea: 12 years of experience. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18: 699.
7. Chaudhary P, Kumar R, Ahirwar N, et al. A retrospective cohort study of 756 cases of abdominal tuberculosis: Two decades single centre experience. Indian J Tuberc. 2016; 63; 4:245-250.
8. Baluku JB, Musaazi J, Mulwana Ret, al.Prevalence and Predictors of CD4+ T-Lymphocytopenia Among HIV-Negative Tuberculosis Patients in Uganda. Res Rep Trop Med. 2020; 11: 45-51.
9. Kumar P. IFNgamma-producing CD4(+) T lymphocytes: the double-edged swords in tuberculosis. Clin Transl Med. 2017; 6: 21.
10. de Martino M, Lodi L, Galli L, Chiappini E. Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Narrative Review. Front Pediatr. 2019; 7: 350.
11. Luo H, Zhu B, Gong L, et al. The value of serum prealbumin in the diagnosis and therapeutic response of tuberculosis: a retrospective study. Plos One. 2013; 8: e79940.
12. Shreshtha S, Ghuliani D. Abdominal tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis of 45 cases. Indian J Tuberc. 2016; 63: 219-24.
13. Singh H, Krishnamurthy G, Rajendran J, et al. Surgery for Abdominal Tuberculosis in the Present Era: Experience from a Tertiary-Care Center. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018; 19: 640-5.
14. Khan R, Abid S, Jafri W, et al. Diagnostic dilemma of abdominal tuberculosis in non-HIV patients: an ongoing challenge for physicians. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:6371-5.
15. Gonie A, Bekele K. Perforated tuberculous appendicitis: a rare case report. Int Med Case Rep J 2018;11:129-31.
16. Lee SY, Kang CY, Low SC, et al. Tuberculous biliary stricture. Clin J Gastroenterol 2012; 5:53-8.
17. Ai JW, Li Y, Cheng Q, et al. Diagnosis of local hepatic tuberculosis through next-generation sequencing: Smarter, faster and better. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018; 42: 178-81.
18. Vazquez ME, Gomez-Cerezo J, Atienza SM, et al.Computed tomography findings of peritoneal tuberculosis: systematic review of seven patients diagnosed in 6 years (1996-2001). Clin Imaging. 2004; 28: 340-3.
19. Srivastava U, Almusa O, Tung KW, et al. Tuberculous peritonitis. Radiol Case Rep. 2014; 9: 971.
20. Da RE, Pedrassa BC, Bormann RL, et al. Abdominal tuberculosis: a radiological review with emphasis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Radiol Bras. 2015; 48: 181-91.
21. Wang SB, Ji YH, Wu HB, et al. PET/CT for differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis: The parietal peritoneum. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96: e5867.
22. Maynard-Smith L, Larke N, Peters JA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis when testing non-respiratory samples: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14: 709.
23. Dahale AS, Puri AS, Kumar A, et al. Tissue Xpert(R) MTB/RIF Assay in Peritoneal Tuberculosis: To be (Done) or Not to be (Done). Cureus. 2019; 11: e5009.
24. Rufai SB, Singh S, Singh A, et al. Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF on Ascitic Fluid Samples for Detection of Abdominal Tuberculosis. J Lab Physicians. 2017; 9: 47-52.
25. Jin W, Pan J, Miao Q, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for active tuberculosis in clinical practice at a tertiary general hospital. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8: 1065.
26. Kumar S, Gupta P, Sharma V, et al. Role of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Omentum in Diagnosis of Abdominal Tuberculosis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019; 20: 91-4.
Instrucciones para citar
Wenting J, Yuyan M, Qingfeng S, Yao Z, Yumeng Y, Yi S, et all. Clinical features and diagnostic approaches for abdominal tuberculosis: five-year experience from a non-tuberculosis-designated hospital in China. 8022/2021


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 955 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 145 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 07/04/2021

Aceptado: 02/12/2021

Prepublicado: 10/12/2021

Publicado: 27/07/2022

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 208 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 247 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 476 días


Compartir
Este artículo ha sido valorado por 1 lectores .
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas