Año 2025 / Volumen 117 / Número 10
Carta
Literature searches report in systematic reviews

618-619

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10848/2024

Joaquín González Aroca,

Resumen
In response to the study by Tian et al. on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with autoimmune hepatitis, this letter commends the authors' contribution but highlights a critical omission: the lack of details regarding their search strategy. Reproducibility, as defined by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, is essential in systematic reviews (SRs) to ensure consistent results and transparency. Incomplete reporting, particularly in search strategies, compromises the reproducibility and integrity of SRs. To address this issue, it is recommended that future authors include detailed search strategies and consult the PRISMA-S Extension checklist for guidance on proper reporting.
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. Tian Zhaoxu , Chen Yonghua , Yao Yingxin , Chen Lihua , Zhu Xiakai , Shen Zhaocong , Yang Shanwei , Jin Hangbin . Immunogenicity and risk factors for poor humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with autoimmune hepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2024. doi: 10.17235/reed.2024.10053/2023.
2. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.), Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.), Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.), Board on Research Data and Information, National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (U.S.), Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics. Reproducibility and replicability in science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2019.
3. Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, et al. Searching for and selecting studies. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: version 6.0. 2019. https://training. cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04.
4. Rethlefsen ML, Brigham TJ, Price C, Moher D, Bouter LM, Kirkham JJ, Schroter S, Zeegers MP. Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;166:111229. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111229.
5. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, Koffel JB; PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
Instrucciones para citar
González Aroca J. Literature searches report in systematic reviews. 10848/2024


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 228 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 0 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 08/10/2024

Aceptado: 14/10/2024

Prepublicado: 24/10/2024

Publicado: 10/10/2025

Tiempo de prepublicación: 16 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 367 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2025 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas