Year 2021 / Volume 113 / Number 6
Review
Is endoscopic drainage better than percutaneous drainage for patients with pancreatic fluid collections? A comparative meta-analysis

454-462

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7170/2020

Qi-Chen Cai, Yu-Xin Zhang, Yang Liao, Jian-Ping Gong, Bin Xiong,

Abstract
Introduction: though endoscopic and percutaneous drainage have emerged as the most common minimally invasive treatments for pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), estimates of therapeutic superiority for either treatment have yielded inconsistent results. Methods: we retrieved studies comparing the efficacy and safety of these two approaches in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were differences in technical success, clinical success, and adverse events, and secondary outcomes included differences in reintervention, need for surgical intervention, mortality, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay. Results: there were nonsignificant differences in technical success rate (OR 0.54; CI: 0.15-1.86), clinical success rate (OR 1.39; CI: 0.82-2.37), adverse events rate (OR 1.21; CI: 0.70-2.11), mortality rate (OR 0.81; CI: 0.30-2.16), and recurrence rate (OR 1.94; CI 0.74-5.07) between the two groups. Reintervention rate (OR 0.19; CI: 0.08-0.45) and percentage of need for surgical intervention (OR 0.08; CI: 0.02-0.39) in the endoscopic drainage group were much lower than in the percutaneous drainage group. Total length of hospital stay (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.60; CI: -0.84 to -0.36) in the endoscopic drainage group was shorter; however, there was a nonsignificant difference in the length of post-procedure hospital stay (SMD: -0.30; CI: -1.05-0.44) between the two groups. Conclusion: endoscopic drainage is effective for PFCs, and superior in terms of lower reintervention and need for surgery rates over traditional percutaneous drainage, despite a similar clinical efficacy and safety compared with traditional percutaneous drainage.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
Related articles

Letter

A giant liver abscess due to Fasciola hepatica infection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6136/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

A rare case of acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis associated with ERCP

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5756/2018

Citation tools
Cai Q, Zhang Y, Liao Y, Gong J, Xiong B. Is endoscopic drainage better than percutaneous drainage for patients with pancreatic fluid collections? A comparative meta-analysis. 7170/2020


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 416 visits.
This article has been downloaded 192 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 20/04/2020

Accepted: 04/10/2020

Online First: 03/12/2020

Published: 04/06/2021

Article revision time: 166 days

Article Online First time: 227 days

Article editing time: 410 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology