Año 2023 / Volumen 115 / Número 8
Editorial
Biostatistics for gastroenterologists. Part II ̶ Rethinking sample size

411-413

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9784/2023

Elena Stallings,

Resumen
Sample size determination is a critical aspect of medical studies, influencing the reliability and generalizability of research findings. This article explores the importance of sample size in both basic and clinical research. The considerations for sample size differ based on the type of research, whether it is involving humans, animals, or cells. In basic research, a larger sample size is necessary to ensure statistical power and reliable results, enhancing the precision and generalizability of findings. In clinical research, determining an appropriate sample size is crucial for obtaining valid and clinically relevant results, ensuring sufficient statistical power to detect differences between treatment groups or validate intervention efficacy. Reporting sample size calculations accurately and complying with reporting guidelines, such as the CONSORT Statement, is essential for transparent and comprehensive research publications. Consulting a statistician is highly recommended to ensure appropriate sample size determination, enhance scientific rigor, and obtain reliable and clinically relevant findings in medical research.
Share Button
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios

07/08/2023 2:56:32
Thanks for sharing
This is an important tool for clinicians that need publish paper about GI topics.
Greeting from MX


Bibliografía
1. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M. Outcome measures and implications for sample-size calculations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:35-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01602. PMID: 19411498.
2. Bujang MA. A Step-by-Step Process on Sample Size Determination for Medical Research. Malays J Med Sci. 2021 Apr;28(2):15-27. doi: 10.21315/mjms2021.28.2.2. Epub 2021 Apr 21. PMID: 33958957; PMCID: PMC8075593.
3. Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15. PMID: 33380887; PMCID: PMC7745163.
4. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafò MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Erratum in: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jun;14(6):451. PMID: 23571845.
5. Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):122-4. PMID: 8015121.
6. Charles P, Giraudeau B, Dechartres A, Baron G, Ravaud P. Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review. BMJ. 2009 May 12;338:b1732. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1732. PMID: 19435763; PMCID: PMC2680945.
7. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332. PMID: 20332509; PMCID: PMC2844940.
8. Harden M, Friede T. Sample size calculation in multi-centre clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0602-y. PMID: 30497390; PMCID: PMC6267841.
9. Tulka S, Knippschild S, Funck S, Goetjes I, Uluk Y, Baulig C. Reporting of statistical sample size calculations in publications of trials on age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and cataract. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252640. PMID: 34086796; PMCID: PMC8177464.
10. Iheozor-Ejiofor, Z., Lakunina, S., Gordon, M., Akintelure, D., Sinopoulou, V. and Akobeng, A. (2021), Sample-size estimation is not reported in 24% of randomised controlled trials of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review. United European Gastroenterol J, 9: 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640620967899
11. Cornish R. Statistics: an introduction to sample size calculations. Loughborough: Mathematics Learning Support Centre; 2006.
Artículos relacionados
Instrucciones para citar
Stallings E. Biostatistics for gastroenterologists. Part II ̶ Rethinking sample size. 9784/2023


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 782 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 145 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 13/06/2023

Aceptado: 15/06/2023

Prepublicado: 27/06/2023

Publicado: 26/07/2023

Tiempo de prepublicación: 14 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 43 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas