Year 2020 / Volume 112 / Number 10
Original
Evaluation of endoscopy requests in the resumption of activity during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: denial of nonindicated requests and prioritization of accepted requests

748-755

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7375/2020

Pilar Díez Redondo, M.ª Henar Núñez Rodríguez, Esteban Fuentes Valenzuela, Rodrigo Nájera Muñoz, Manuel Perez-Miranda,

Abstract
Introduction: the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic forced the closure of endoscopy units. Before resuming endoscopic activity, we designed a protocol to evaluate gastroscopies and colonoscopies cancelled during the pandemic, denying inappropriate requests and prioritizing appropriate ones. Methods: two types of inappropriate request were established: a) COVID-19 context, people aged ≤ 50 years without alarm symptoms and a low probability of relevant endoscopic findings; and b) inappropriate context, requests not in line with clinical guidelines or protocols. Denials were filed in the medical record. Appropriate requests were classified into priority, conventional and follow-up. Requests denied by specialty were compared and the findings of priority requests were evaluated. Results: between March 16th and June 30th 2020, 1,658 requests (44 % gastroscopies and 56 % colonoscopies) were evaluated, of which 1,164 (70 %) were considered as appropriate (priority 8.5 %, conventional 48 %, follow-up 43 % and non-evaluable 0.5 %) and 494 (30 %) as inappropriate (20 % COVID-19 context, 80 % inappropriate context). The reasons for denial of gastroscopy were follow-up of lesions (33 %), insufficiently studied symptoms (20 %) and relapsing symptoms after a previous gastroscopy (18 %). The reasons for denial of colonoscopies were post-polypectomy surveillance (25 %), colorectal cancer after surgery (21 %) and a family history of cancer (13 %). There were significant differences in denied requests according to specialty: General Surgery (52 %), Hematology (37 %) and Primary Care (29 %); 31 % of priority cases showed relevant findings. Conclusions: according to our study, 24 % of endoscopies were discordant with scientific recommendations. Therefore, their denial and the prioritization of appropriate ones optimize the use of resources.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1.- Parodi SM, Liu VX. From Containment to Mitigation of COVID-19 in the US. JAMA. 2020; 323:1441-1442.
2.- Lui RN, Wong SH, Sánchez-Luna SA et al. Overview of Guidance for Endoscopy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:749-759.
3.- Gralnek IM, Hassan C, Beilenhoff U et al. ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and the COVID-19 pandemic. Endoscopy 2020; 52:483-490
4.- Marín-Gabriel JC, Rodríguez de Santiago E. AEG-SEED Position Paper for the Resumption of Endoscopic Activity After the Peak Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.05.004
5.- Crespo J, Andrade R, Alberca de Las Parras F et al. Resumption of Activity in Gastroenterology Departments. Recommendations by SEPD, AEEH, GETECCU and AEG. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2020;112:397-411.
6.- Eskeland SL, Dalén E , Sponheim J, et al. European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy II Guidelines Help in Selecting and Prioritizing Patients Referred to Colonoscopy—A Quality Control Study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014;49:492-500
7.- Morgan DJ, Dhruva SS, Wright SM et al. 2016 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1687-1692.
8.- Gimeno-García AZ, Quintero E. Colonoscopy Appropriateness: Really Needed or a Waste of Time? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:94-101.
9.- Meggio A , Mariotti G , Gentilini M et al. Priority and Appropriateness of Upper Endoscopy Out-Patient Referrals: Two-period Comparison in an Open-Access Unit. Dig Liver Dis 2019;51:1562-1566.
10.- Jong JJ , Lantinga MA, Drenth JP. Prevention of Overuse: A View on Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.World J Gastroenterol 2019;25:178-189.
11.- Rubenstein JH, Pohl H, Adams MA et al. Overuse of Repeat Upper Endoscopy in the Veterans Health Administration: A Retrospective Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2017 ;112:1678-1685.
12.- Pohl H, Robertson D, Welch H. Repeated Upper Endoscopy in the Medicare Population: A Retrospective Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 2014; 160:154-160.
13.- Petruzziello L, Hassan C, Alvaro D et al. Appropriateness of the Indication for Colonoscopy: Is the Endoscopist the 'Gold Standard'? J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:590-594.
14.- Esteban S, Ricci R, Terrasa S, et al. Colonoscopy Overuse in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Associated Factors in Argentina: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Gastroenterol 2017 ;17:162.
15.- Stock C, Hoffmeister M, Birkner B et al. Utilitation and yield of neoplasm in colonoscopies performed within 3 years after screening colonoscopy: a historical cohort study. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 537-544.
16.- Mangas Sanjuan C, Santana E, Cubiella J et al. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:1216-1223.
17.- Rodríguez-de-Santiago E, Frazzoni L, Fuccio L et al. Digestive findings that do not require endoscopic surveillance: Reducing the burden of care: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 491–49
18.- Schoen RE, Razzak A, Yu KJ et al. Incidence and Mortality of Colorectal Cancer in Individuals with a Family History of Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2015; 149:1438-1445.
19.- Mangas-Sanjuan C, Jover R, Cubiella J et al. Vigilancia tras resección de pólipos de colon y de cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 42: 188-201.
20.- Andújar X, Sainz E, Galí A et al. Inappropriateness Rate for Colonoscopy Indications in an Open Access Unit. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 38:313-319.
21.- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. [Internet]2020. Consultado 23 junio 2020. Disponible en https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf
22.- Patel J, McNair A. Identification of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancy in Patients With Uncomplicated Dyspepsia Referred Under the Two-Week-Wait Cancer Pathway: A Single-Centre, 10-year Experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 32:22-25.
23.- Suriani R, Rizzetto M, Mazzucco D et al. Appropriateness of Colonoscopy in a Digestive Endoscopy Unit: A Prospective Study Using ASGE Guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 2009;15:41-45.
24.- Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn Ch at al.Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16:1321-1328.
25.- Grassini M, Verna C, Battaglia E et al. Education Improves Colonoscopy Appropriateness. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:88-93.
26.- Elwin G, Owen D, Roberts L et al. Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16:67-70
27.- Chivers K, Basnyat P, Taffinder N. The Impact of National Guidelines on the Waiting List for Colonoscopy: A Quantitative Clinical Audit.Colorectal Dis 2010;12:632-639.
Related articles

Letter

Autoimmune hepatitis after SARS-C¬¬oV-2 vaccination

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9579/2023

Digestive Diseases Image

Endosonographic and ERCP findings in COVID-19 critical illness cholangiopathy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9218/2022

Letter

An uncommon colonic polyp

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9160/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Intestinal obstruction due to bariolith impaction

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9084/2022

Letter

Anorectal malignant melanoma, a diagnostic challenge

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9068/2022

Letter

Lead ingestion, medical emergency and action plan

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9048/2022

Letter

Endoscopic findings of radiation ileitis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9036/2022

Letter

Endoscopic imaging of pneumatosis intestinalis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8972/2022

Letter

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 as a potential achalasia trigger

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8975/2022

Editorial

Colonoscopy — When quality matters

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8942/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Acute respiratory failure secondary to megaesophagus: think beyond COVID-19

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8847/2022

Letter

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, a new autoimmune hepatitis trigger?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8820/2022

Letter

Surgical acute abdomen and COVID-19 vaccination

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8721/2022

Digestive Diseases Image

Colonic Kaposi’s sarcoma as the first clinical manifestation of undiagnosed HIV

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8717/2022

Letter

Gastrointestinal lymphoma, a rare endoscopic lesion

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8555/2021

Letter

AMA-positive hepatitis induced by the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8533/2021

Letter

Cecal MALT lymphoma: a challenging diagnosis

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8526/2021

Letter

A case of COVID-19 with concomitant infection with hepatitis A

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8372/2021

Letter

COVID-19 and aorto-enteric fistula

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8272/2021

Letter

Surprises in cecal intubation: foreign bodies in the colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8155/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Ink stained gastric lesions: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8141/2021

Digestive Diseases Image

Portal thrombosis in a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8099/2021

Letter

Autoimmune hepatitis triggered by COVID-19

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8045/2021

Letter

Pneumoperitoneum and COVID-19. A causal association?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7877/2021

Letter

COVID-19 and the liver: the chicken or the egg dilemma

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7861/2021

Letter

Acute pancreatitis related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Disclaimer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7853/2021

Letter

Pancreatic injury and acute pancreatitis in COVID-19 patients

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.7807/2021

Editorial

Leading in turbulent times with the aim to serve

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7684/2020

Letter

Pancreatic injury in COVID-19: pathogenesis and challenges

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7541/2020

Letter

SARS-CoV-2 and acute pancreatitis: a new etiological agent?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7481/2020

Letter

Latin American authorship in scientific production on COVID-19

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7432/2020

Digestive Diseases Image

Phlebosclerotic colitis: an unusual cause of abdominal pain and hematochezia

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7358/2020

Letter

COVID-19. Immunothrombosis and the gastrointestinal tract

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7292/2020

Letter

The effect of Adacolumn® on ulcerative colitis with COVID-19

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7156/2020

Rapid reviews

COVID-19, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and the small bowel

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7137/2020

Case Report

Primary colon mantle lymphoma: a misleading macroscopic appearance!

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6405/2019

Digestive Diseases Image

Cervical arthrodesis penetrated into the esophagus detected by gastroscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6222/2019

Special Article

Quality indicators in gastroscopy. Gastroscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6023/2018

Digestive Diseases Image

Colorectal penetration by two intrauterine devices

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5974/2018

Editorial

Colorectal cancer screening and survival

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5870/2018

Special Article

The current situation of digestive endoscopy units in the Valencian Community

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.5676/2018

Letter

Bacterial endogenous endophthalmitis after colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5658/2018

Review

Quality indicators in colonoscopy. The colonoscopy procedure

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5408/2017

Letter to the Editor

A rare complication after colonoscopy: a splenic rupture

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5362/2017

Letter to the Editor

Acute appendicitis after a colonic endoscopic submucosal resection

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5307/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

Contribution of the virtual colonoscopy in a case of intestinal intussusception

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5261/2017

Digestive Diseases Image

A bull horn fragment found on colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5020/2017

Editorial

Issue pending: minimizing anxiety before colonoscopy

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4756/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Intrauterine device in the rectal cavity

Letter to the Editor

Primary chancre in the rectum: an underdiagnosed cause of rectal ulcer

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4457/2016

Digestive Diseases Image

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis

Letter to the Editor

Splenic rupture after colorectal cancer screening

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3714/2015

Citation tools
Díez Redondo P, Núñez Rodríguez M, Fuentes Valenzuela E, Nájera Muñoz R, Perez-Miranda M. Evaluation of endoscopy requests in the resumption of activity during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: denial of nonindicated requests and prioritization of accepted requests. 7375/2020


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 1420 visits.
This article has been downloaded 387 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 26/06/2020

Accepted: 18/07/2020

Online First: 21/09/2020

Published: 07/10/2020

Article revision time: 12 days

Article Online First time: 87 days

Article editing time: 103 days


Share
This article has been rated by 2 readers.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology