Year 2020 / Volume 112 / Number 11
Original
Spanish online survey on informed consent for the performance of paracentesis. Do we have it? Do we use it?

854-859

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7179/2020

Javier Jiménez Sánchez, Lidia Serrano Díaz, Diana Chuni Jiménez, Miguel Ruiz Moreno, Blanca Gallego Pérez, Carmen María Marín Bernabé, María Gómez Lozano, Daniel García Belmonte, Rosa Gómez Espín, Isabel Nicolás de Prado, José Enrique Hernández Ortuño, Esperanza Egea Simón, Juan José Martínez Crespo,

Abstract
Introduction: informed consent is necessary for invasive procedures as a document that guarantees the ethical health relationship and patient safety. Aims: to analyze whether we have and use informed consent documents for paracentesis in our hospitals and to obtain data on the technique. Methods: a descriptive observational study was performed during December 2019, via a cross-sectional survey disseminated through social networks, aimed at specialists and residents of gastroenterology. Results: two hundred and three anonymous surveys were included (55.2 % gastroenterologist and 44.8 % residents) from 74 hospitals in 34 Spanish provinces. Ninety respondents (44.3 %) stated that they had the document in their centers. Of these, 29 (32.2 %) always provided it, 31 (34.4 %) provided it sometimes and 21 (23.3 %) never. Seventy-two professionals (35.5 %) answered that they did not have it and 41 (20.5 %) selected “unknown”. Of these, 77 (68.1 %) considered it was necessary to create this document, 31 (27.4 %) did not think it was necessary and five (4.4 %) did not answer. With regards to the technique, 173 (85.2 %) performed paracentesis under direct visualization and 30 (14.8 %) were eco-guided on most occasions. One hundred and nine (53.7 %) always applied local anesthetic, 80 (39.4 %) sometimes and 14 (6.9 %) did not. One hundred and sixty-seven respondents (82.3 %) considered it to be a simple technique versus 36 (17.7 %) who thought that it was of intermediate complexity. In terms of risk, 150 (73.5 %) considered it was low and 52 (25.6 %), medium. Ninety-nine (48.8 %) experienced minor complications and 37 (18.2 %) experienced major complications. Conclusions: paracentesis is a common technique in digestive services and could be associated with complications, even though it is considered to be simple and safe. Due to the important intra- and inter-hospital variability that this technique presents, we consider standardized training in this technique is necessary, as well as the creation, spread and use of informed consents.
Share Button
New comment
Comments
No comments for this article
References
1 Cocanour CS. Informed consent - It’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):993-997. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.015.
2 Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P, et al. The management of ascites in cirrhosis: report on the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club. Hepatology 2003; 38: 258–66. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50315
3 Runyon BA. Paracentesis of ascites fluid. A safe procedure. Arch Inter Med 1986; 146: 2259-61.
4 Mallory A, Schaefer JW. Complications of diagnostic paracentesis in patients with liver disease. JAMA 1978; 239: 628-30. 10.1001/jama.1978.03280340048020
5 De Gottardi A, Thévenot T, Spahr L, et al. Risk of complications after abdominal paracentesis in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Hepatology 2009; 7: 906-9. 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.004
6 Sharzehi K, Jain V, Naveed A, et al. Hemorrhagic complications of paracentesis: a systematic review of the literature. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014, 2014:985141. 10.1155/2014/985141
7 Grabau CM, Crago SF, Hoff LK, et al. Performance standards for therapeutic abdominal paracentesis. Hepatology 2004; 40: 484-8. 10.1002/hep.20317
8 Riesenberg LA, Berg K, Berg D, et al. The development of a validated checklist for paracentesis: preliminary results. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(3):227-231. 10.1177/1062860612460399
9 J. Fyson, L. Chapman, M. Tatton, el al. Abdominal Paracentesis: Use of a Standardised Procedure Checklist and Equipment Kit Improves Procedural Quality and Reduces Complications. Intern Med J. 2018 Jan 18. 10.1111/imj.13741
10 Sakai H, Sheer TA, Mendler MH, et al. Choosing the location for non-image guided abdominal paracentesis. Liver Int 2005; 25: 984-6.
11 Walzak A, Bacchus M, Schaefer JP, et al. Diagnosing technical competence in six bedside procedures: comparing checklists and a global rating scale in the assessment of resident performance. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1100-1108.10.1097/ACM.0000000000000704
12 Sall D, Wigger GW, Kinnear B, et al. Paracentesis simulation: a comprehensive approach to procedural education. MedEdPORTAL. 2018;14:10747. 10.15766/mep_2374- 8265.10747
Citation tools
Jiménez Sánchez J, Serrano Díaz L, Chuni Jiménez D, Ruiz Moreno M, Gallego Pérez B, Marín Bernabé C, et all. Spanish online survey on informed consent for the performance of paracentesis. Do we have it? Do we use it? . 7179/2020


Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Metrics
This article has received 472 visits.
This article has been downloaded 157 times.

Statistics from Dimensions


Statistics from Plum Analytics

Publication history

Received: 23/04/2020

Accepted: 05/05/2020

Online First: 15/10/2020

Published: 10/11/2020

Article revision time: 6 days

Article Online First time: 175 days

Article editing time: 201 days


Share
This article hasn't been rated yet.
Reader rating:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology is the official organ of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Cookie policy Privacy Policy Legal Notice © Copyright 2023 y Creative Commons. The Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology