Año 2025 / Volumen 117 / Número 4
Original
New predictors of recurrence in post-polypectomy surveillance - A retrospective analysis of risk stratification for advanced adenomas and polyps

188-197

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10832/2024

Jun Zhang, You Deng, Hailing Tang, Jiaming Liu, Wangli Si, Baihe Sun, Kun Zhuang,

Resumen
Background and aims: recent guidelines emphasized that not all patients with recurrent polyps benefit from post-polypectomy surveillance, except for advanced adenomas recurrence. This study aimed to analyze the recurrence risk factors for advanced adenomas and investigated the difference from any polyp recurrence. Methods: this retrospective observational study included patients who underwent colonoscopy and at least one post-polypectomy surveillance. Multivariate regression models identified risk factors for the recurrence of polyps and advanced adenomas. The Youden index determined the optimal cut-off value for risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curve estimated the cumulative recurrence rates, and the log-rank tests compared the differences between these curves. Results: a total of 1,818 patients had polyps at baseline examination. During post-polypectomy surveillance, 1,063 patients had recurrent polyps, and 64 patients experienced recurrent advanced adenomas. Multivariate logistic analysis identified age as an independent risk factor for both advanced adenoma (OR [95 % CI]: 1.028 [1.003-1.056]) and polyps (OR [95 % CI]: 1.019 [1.009-1.028]), with cut-off values of 57 years and 53 years, respectively. A cut-off value of 40 years can increase the predictive sensitivity to 95 %. Polyps size (OR [95 % CI]: 1.070 [1.014-1.147]) and high-risk pathology (OR [95 % CI]: 6.339 [2.057-23.919]) were significantly associated with recurrence of advanced adenomas, but not with any polyps, with a size cut-off value of 7.5 mm. Except for high-risk pathology, neither hyperplastic polyps nor tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia increased the recurrence risk of advanced adenomas. Conclusions: a cut-off value of 40 years can increase the predictive sensitivity to 95 % for both advanced adenomas and any polyps. Polyps size and high-risk pathology were associated with the recurrence of advanced adenoma, but not with any polyps.
Resumen coloquial
Recent guidelines emphasized that not all patients with recurrent polyps benefit from post-polypectomy surveillance, except for advanced adenomas recurrence. Our study distinguished risk factors for any polyps and advanced adenomas recurrence, contributing to stratify risk and produce a personalized surveillance strategy. High-risk patients can be monitored more closely, while low-risk patients can avoid unnecessary procedures. In addition, 40 years can increase the predictive sensitivity to 95% in our study, indicating that earlier screening is need for increased incidence of colorectal cancer in younger patients.
Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
[1] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality
Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.
[2] Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–67.
[3] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33.
[4] Dekker E, Rex DK. Advances in CRC prevention: screening and surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1970–84.
[5] Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.
[6] Zorzi M, Battagello J, Amidei CB,et al. Low Colorectal Cancer Risk After Resection of High-Risk Pedunculated Polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22(7):1518-1527.e7.
[7] Matthew D Rutter,James East,Colin J Rees, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines. Gut. 2020;69(2):201-223.
[8] Cross AJ, Robbins EC, Pack K,et al. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26(26):1-156.
[9] Abu Freha N, Abu Tailakh M, Elkrinawi J, et al. Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: are we following the guidelines? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(7):1343-1346.
[10] Chi Z, Lin Y, Huang J, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of colorectal conventional adenoma and serrated polyp. Gastroenterology Report. 2021;1–7.
[11] Yinglong Huang, Wei Gong, Bingzhong Su, et al. Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:838–845.
[12] Antonio Facciorusso, Marianna Di Maso, Gaetano Serviddio, et al. Development and validation of a risk score for advanced colorectal adenoma recurrence after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(26): 6049-56.
[13] Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal Adenoma Characteristics as Predictors of Recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(3):323-33.
[14] Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D et al. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182–8.
[15] Martínez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, et al. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenoma. Gastroenterology. 2001;120(5):1077-1083.
[16] Abdallah M, Ahmed K, Abbas D, et al. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2023;55(12):1083-1094.
[17] Pohl H, Anderson JC, Aguilera-Fish A, et al. Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplastic Polyps After Incomplete Resection. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(10):1377-1384.
[18] Rotermund C, Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M, et al. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(29):4007-4018.
[19] Wallace MB, Sharma P, Bhandari P, et al. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(1):295-304.e5.
[20] Atkin WS, Valori R, Kuipers EJ, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition: colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy. 2012;44 Suppl 3:SE151-SE163.
[21] Park JH, Moon HS, Kwon IS, et al. Quality of preoperative colonoscopy affects missed postoperative adenoma detection in colorectal cancer patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65(7):2063-2070.
[22] Kemper G, Turan AS, Schoon EJ, et al. Endoscopic techniques to reduce recurrence rates after colorectal EMR: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(10):5422-5429.
[23] Xi X, Fu Z, Liu T, Lin Y, et al. Establishment and Verification of Scoring System for Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:4545-4552.
[24] Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, et al. Factors Associated With Recurrence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma After Endoscopic Resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(8):1148-54.e4.
[25] Liao P, Chen LM, Huang WH, et al. Association of clinical characteristics and recurrence of conventional colorectal adenomas with patient age: a single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(11):8373-8383.
[26] Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline-Update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020;52(8): 687-700.
[27] Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(3):233-254.
[28] Cho MY, Siegel DA, Demb J, et al. Increasing Colorectal Cancer Incidence Before and After Age 50: Implications for Screening Initiation and Promotion of "On-Time" Screening. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(8):4086-4091.
[29] Rachel B Issaka, Andrew T Chan, Samir Gupta. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2023;165(5):1280-1291.
[30] Expert Group on Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer, Chinese Society of Oncology, Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on the early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China (2023 edition). Chin Arch Gen Surg, 2024, 18(1):1-13.
[31] Kalyta A, Ruan Y, Telford JJ, et, al. Association of Reducing the Recommended Colorectal Cancer Screening Age With Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Costs in Canada Using OncoSim. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(10):1432-1436.
[32]Sharma I, Kim S, Sridhar S, Basha R. Colorectal Cancer: An Emphasis on Factors Influencing Racial/Ethnic Disparities. Crit Rev Oncog. 2020;25(2):151-160.
[33] Viel JF, Studer JM, Ottignon Y, et al. Predictors of Colorectal Polyp Recurrence after the First Polypectomy in Private Practice Settings: A Cohort Study. A Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2012;7(12): e50990.
[34] Du JY, Huang GY, Xie YC, et al. High levels of triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and the number of colorectal polyps are risk factors for colorectal polyp recurrence after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Aug;13(4):1753-1760.
[35] Lee J, Seo JW, Sim HC, et al. Predictors of High-Risk Adenoma Occurrence at Surveillance Colonoscopy in Patients Who Undergo Colorectal Adenoma Removal. Dig Dis. 2018;36(5):354-361.
[36] Kathrin Halfter, Lea Bauerfeind, Anne Schlesinger Raab, et al. Colonoscopy and polypectomy: beside age, size of polyps main factor for long term risk of colorectal cancer in a screening population. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2021;147:2645–2658.
[37] Wai K Leung, James Yw Lau, Bing Yee Suen, et al. Repeat-Screening Colonoscopy 5 Years After Normal Baseline-Screening Colonoscopy in Average-Risk Chinese: A Prospective Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2028–34.
[38] Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-Year Colon Surveillance After Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–1085.
[39] Monachese M, Mankaney G, El-Khider F, et al. Association between baseline hyperplastic polyps and metachronous serrated lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(6):1401-1407.e1.
Artículos relacionados

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Polipectomía bajo el agua en orificio apendicular en paciente con anticoagulación

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9842/2023

Carta

Recurrencia del schwannoma gástrico

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9480/2023

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Esófago negro

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9217/2022

Imagen en Patología Digestiva

Perforación por polipectomía con asa fría de un pólipo diminuto de colon

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2021.8221/2021

Carta

A granular cell tumor: an unusual colon polyp

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5918/2018

Editorial

Trasplante de pulmón y disfunción esofágica

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5693/2018

Original

Colonic diverticulosis and the metabolic syndrome: an association?

DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5009/2017

Instrucciones para citar
Zhang J, Deng Y, Tang H, Liu J, Si W, Sun B, et all. New predictors of recurrence in post-polypectomy surveillance - A retrospective analysis of risk stratification for advanced adenomas and polyps. 10832/2024


Descargar en un gestor de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 1340 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 70 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 01/10/2024

Aceptado: 04/11/2024

Prepublicado: 19/11/2024

Publicado: 03/04/2025

Tiempo de prepublicación: 49 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 184 días


Compartir
Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:




Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva
La REED es el órgano oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva, la SociedadEspañola de Endoscopia Digestiva y la Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva
Política de cookies Política de Privacidad Aviso Legal © Copyright 2025 y Creative Commons. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas